--- In [email protected], Bruce Napier <br...@...> wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 14:55, Steve Haywood wrote:
>
> >> You'd be wasting your time under FOI. You can't define continuous
> >> cruisers.
> > That's been BW's problem these last 20 years. Our licences allow us to
> > cruise 27/7, 365 days a year. In that sense we are all continuous
> > cruisers.
> > It's just that some people have made the decision to take advantage
> > of what
> > they're paying for.
> >
> You must be tired, Steve!
>
> The question is, "Of all those who have licensed a boat to be kept on
> BW waters, how many have not declared a home mooring and are
> therefore deemed to be continuous cruisers, as set out in Schedule 2
> to the BW Licence Terms and Conditions."
>
> Come to think of it, I'm not sure it needs an FOI request, didn't BW
> give an estimate in a recent press release?
>
> All the best
>
> Bruce
>
Do you want to include those that declare a mooring but are never on
it because they are cruising?
Why is the info wanted?
Sue
