Must admit I mused on having fun and big brother when watching the CCTV blokes in Soho peering down alleys to check no one was at it illegally (as opposed to indoors which now is legal - as long as it is one person). I read a book on the ins and outs of this years back when punters were allowed to check if it was really a lady. Now its all cameras but no real laws. They reserve them for us.
--- On Fri, 2/6/09, Dave Larrington <[email protected]> wrote: From: Dave Larrington <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [canals-list] Am I paranoid? To: [email protected] Date: Friday, February 6, 2009, 9:22 AM Phil & Anne Irons wrote: > Sorry for the rant, but I have not seen anyone put forth an argument > in favour of this technological advance, and I thought it worth > while. After all, if you're behaving yourself, it shouldn't matter > if Big Brother is looking over your shoulder, should it? Only if you trust that Big Brother *knows* you're behaving yourself. And Big Brother has been known to get it wrong. Which can result in consequences that could spoil one's whole day. Seven bullets to the head, for example. -- Dave Larrington <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk> The best way to confuse a Daily Mail reader is to tell it that paedophiles form the staple diet of asylum seekers. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
