On 10 Oct 2009, at 20:38, Steve Wood wrote: > > Agreed in all aspects (especially the first bit :) ) though I'm still > unconvinced that it is relevant.
It's only relevant insofar as it is what I have paid and affects the
degree of my miffedness. Especially with BW.
It's not relevant to the specifics of what visitor moorings would/
could/should be available where, when and to whom. That's another
argument and not part of my recently rankled state.
{;>)
Beeky
