I’ve built a deployment framework around Capistrano and a few plugins. It 
deploys apps build using 3 different tech stacks — Java/JBoss, PHP and Rails — 
and it’s been in use for more than a year with little to no maintenance.

I thank you for all the hard work and for how beautifully simple and extensible 
cap is.

I also second the idea of a core tech-agnostic gem and plugins. Sounds like the 
way to go and each community could create/contribute plugins for their stacks.  

--Cassiano Leal
http://cassianoleal.com
http://twitter.com/cassianoleal


On Monday, October 7, 2013 at 16:35, Caleb Brown wrote:

> I use capistrano for all my projects (rails, django, wordpress, magento, 
> etc.) I'm very grateful for it and agree that your concerns are major and 
> should be addressed by the community at large.   
>  
> I'm sorry you've had to deal with poisonous people and the fragmentation and 
> I hope that the community can step up and help out while still addressing 
> your concerns.
>  
> -c
>  
> On Sunday, October 6, 2013 1:11:47 PM UTC-4, Lee Hambley wrote:
> > Dear List Members,
> >  
> > I've been experiencing a rather overwhelming level of burnout lately, as 
> > I'm sure many of you regular readers on the list and on Github have 
> > noticed, my patience has grown short, and I'm not the passionate, helpful 
> > chap I once was. (Or at least, that I once tried to be)  
> >  
> > I'm not even sure if it's a case of poisonous people 
> > (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q52kFL8zVoM) sapping my energy, or a more 
> > general case of burnout since I run my own company, and have very little 
> > free time.  
> >  
> > I'm considering stepping down from maintaining Capistrano at all, if I had 
> > to pick on a shortlist of reasons, it'd be:
> > I don't use Rails all that much anymore, and many of the problems people 
> > report with Cap are really problems of Rails (i.e the entire manifest/asset 
> > pipeline disaster). When people have problems, I'm not equipped to diagnose 
> > what might be going wrong, as I simply don't deploy that way. My rails 
> > projects are all Rails 4 with no assets, or they are Rails 3 with the most 
> > standard  
> > I've rewritten Capistrano and it's now a better tool, but I too cowardly to 
> > release it and make it mainstream, as Im afraid it'll destroy whatever good 
> > will for open source I have left when the flood of support questions 
> > inevitably comes in, followed by all the people who are unhappy with what 
> > I've built and feel obliged to tell me how bad I am at software.
> > Ruby Gems is an awful platform. I feel crushed by the burden for making 
> > things secure, both making things difficult to use wrongly, and making them 
> > safe to use. Ruby Gems makes signing gems overly difficult, uses 
> > non-standard methods, and nobody bothers to validate them anyway.
> >  
> > Whilst I believe strongly in Capistrano as a general purpose tool for all 
> > people right up to epic scale, where things start to get really bespoke for 
> > companies such as the Twitters and Google. I do think the future of 
> > software deployment is in small, containerised VMs and so-called PaaS, as 
> > what we're all doing right now has to end, some time.  
> >  
> > Non-deterministic deploys of code from (usually) un-tagged source control, 
> > with production environments needing all kinds of eccentric heavy weight 
> > tools to help with mutating assets to solve problems that are mostly a 
> > product of poor framework in the first place design can't go on forever.  
> >  
> > Whilst I think Rails is a great framework (and by and large most users of 
> > Capistrano are Rails users), it's asset pipeline is a poorly thought out 
> > idea which causes a myriad of problems. Whilst I love Ruby as a language, 
> > it's failure to standardise on an interpreter has lead to horrible 
> > situations with people using rvm and rbenv and chruby in production where 
> > things really ought to be more specified.  
> >  
> > These problems are problems of other tools, problems of poor design, and 
> > problems of poor education. People are often using rvm and rbenv in 
> > production environments because Ruby is pathologically difficult to install 
> > correctly on modern Linux distributions; and more often than not people 
> > choose LTS versions of their distribution, and then throw those guarantees 
> > out of the window by replacing system components with bleeding edge 
> > versions of turbo-GC hacked version of their required interpreters. This 
> > wouldn't be a problem, except that it's left up to Capistrano, and by 
> > extension to me to work out all the insane ways people might configure 
> > their repositories and production environments, and interpreter switchers 
> > and try to find a way to make it all work together. So far I've been 
> > holding it together, but I'm starting to fall apart at the seams, and I 
> > don't want Capistrano to fall apart with me.  
> >  
> > To everyone who has contributed code to the 2.x branch, and everyone who 
> > has contributed code to the 3.x branch, in particular Tom Clements and Kir 
> > Shatrov I feel an immense debts of gratitude. To @torrancew on Freenode IRC 
> > (I don't want to use your real name here, and I couldn't reach you to ask 
> > for permission) thank you sincerely for years of patience, and support in 
> > the #capistrano channel.  
> >  
> > For everyone else, I'd appreciate your input, how can I take the load off 
> > myself, how can I find a way to do this better, and build a better tool 
> > that is easier to maintain and easier to release, without the fear of 
> > breaking people's builds? How can I trust someone enough to hand over the 
> > baton if I can't learn to live with this level of stress?  
> >  
> > To anyone who works at Github who reads this, why can't I add a file to 
> > tell people not to open issues on Github for user support, when there's a 
> > perfectly good mailing list here???
> >  
> > My next steps:
> > I'll release gems, correctly version bumbed (semver) for all unreleased 
> > code. If it's broken, sorry.
> > If people are using Capistrano without locking a known-good version in 
> > their Gemfile.
> > I won't be signing Gem releases, it's too painful, and so few people 
> > actually bother verifying Gem signatures, it's simply not worth it. And I 
> > hate that.
> > I'll be closing all open issues and pull requests at GH that relate to the 
> > v2 branch of the code.
> > I'll be yanking 2.5.15 as it's broken (something about Subversion flags 
> > that I have no way of testing, or verifying, and none of the proposed fixes 
> > include tests, so I'm rolling back to 2.5.14 which apparently didn't 
> > exhibit this problem.)
> > I won't be taking any more code for the v2 branch of the code. I haven't 
> > used it for more than a year, it's slow, was broken by some ill advised 
> > merges from someone who was trying to help, but really didn't make things 
> > better
> > I'll be looking for help with testing things before they are released. That 
> > means, following this release, no release until whoever contributed the 
> > code can verify that it works, and it's spent a while in beta.
> > I won't be seen in the IRC channel very often, I can't afford the time to 
> > maintain a presence there, and it's a wasteful medium for helping people as 
> > it's such an unstructured ephemeral stream of data.
> >  
> >  
> > I'll be encouraging everyone I meet to find a better way to deploy 
> > software, using containers, or switching to a language better suited to 
> > deployment, where Gem bundlers aren't required to get all the load paths 
> > fixed, and where concatenating a few css files, and minifying Javascript 
> > doesn't take 10 minutes.
> >  
> > I'll hold the reigns for now, but I need your help to keep going. I need to 
> > know that there are people for whom this project still matters, as the only 
> > people I ever hear feedback from are the disappointed, angry, vocal, 
> > entitled, minority.  
> >  
> > Yours, an exhausted Lee Hambley
> >  
> > --
> > http://lee.hambley.name/
> > +49 (0) 170 298 5667
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> --  
> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Capistrano" group.
> * To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]) For more options, visit this 
> group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
> ---  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Capistrano" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
-- 
* You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
* To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
* To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Capistrano" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to