Tim wrote: >Interesting to see this http://www.medfloss.org/node/271. It shows >that despite the project appearing to be dead there is a lot of >interest from outside of the project if only the patient could be >resuscitated :-)
I agree with you... Tim wrote: >I think a revitalised web site is prerequisite for >getting developers involved. >Also when development work gets discussed it would be much better to >discuss it here and so people know what is happening and it encourages >others to join in. A revitalized website alone is not enough... it is needed clear ideas and agreement about what and how you will going to do... Would be nice to know who will going to take the leadership of proceed with the project or if there will be changes. Robert Meggle wrote: >There are some still pending other - non development - tasks where everybody >could support. Especially the above mentioned language files are almost not >complete or not correct translated. There is no >programming skills been needed, just native speaker. >Also if there are some contributions about to maintain the wiki or website. >Also there is no development skills been needed. So there is quite a lot >of work. :) I think the people involved should establish here (at this place) what would be the next moves of the project, would also be desirable that in a couple of weeks, you could make a TODO list, so any newcomer can have a more complete idea of the current state of the project. And beyond other obvious missing items on the web site, it have already been mentioned many times, you could publish there what here is agreed. Tim wrote: >... it seems >there is a chicken and egg situation. People are reluctant to give >their time if they do not believe that the project has a future. As I said previously every project have a future if there is someone to take care of it. It is striking how many similar projects people starts with the same or many points of contact, avoiding participating here, in a project that is already known from begining of 2000. I don't know if I am missing something, but does not seem a coincidence of fate... I am a bit reluctant about to believe in the reborn of the project... but anyway I am glad to read that wheels are in motion... regards --- Alejandro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list Care2002-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
