Hi Taosheng,

I tried running postborder.sh on a dataset I have here, and I got a core dump 
on the offending line:

+ caret_command -surface-sphere-multi-morph Human.SAIS_018.L.73730.spec 
deformed_Human.SAIS_018.L.Midthickness_711-2B.mws.coord 
Human.SAIS_018.L.SPHERICAL.73730.MWS.coord Human.SAIS_018.L.CLOSED.73730.topo
./PALS_B12.LR/postborder.sh: line 50: 27257 Segmentation fault      (core 
dumped) caret_command -surface-sphere-multi-morph $SPEC $FIDUCIAL_MWS 
$SPHERE_MWS $TOPO

You're not getting a core dump, but something else is clearly going awry with 
that line.

I tried backtracking to a June 2011 vintage caret, and it completed with no 
problems.  Here is the version I used:

http://brainvis.wustl.edu/pub/caret/caret_distribution_Linux64.v5.64.zip
login pub
password download

Here are the logs for the for the two versions of caret (bad and good):

Problem log:
        http://brainmap.wustl.edu/pub/donna/US/MI/postborder.log
Good log:
        http://brainvis.wustl.edu/pub/donna/US/MI/postborder.201106.log

I'm not sure when caret_command will be fixed, but I will pass the dataset and 
details on to the developers.

Donna


On Nov 26, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Donna Dierker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Taosheng,
> 
> I am going to try postborder.sh on my new Linux box and see if it does the 
> same thing.
> 
> I don't see any candidate culprits in my ~/.caret5_preferences file.
> 
> No one else has reported this issue.  More users are moving to the fs_LR 
> pipeline:
> 
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/wiki/index.php/Caret:Operations/Freesurfer_to_fs_LR
> 
> There are trade-offs which are discussed here:
> 
> http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/11/02/cercor.bhr291.full.pdf+html
> 
> One big plus is that there is no border tweaking.
> 
> I'll let you know how my post border.sh trial comes out, or if I need sample 
> data.  But I think I have plenty of sample data right here.  I can't imagine 
> what might be unique about our data that would cause this.
> 
> Donna
> 
> 
> On Nov 26, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Taosheng Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Donna,
>> Yes I can see that line of code in the script. Have you other others on this 
>> list run this command lately? I wonder if you also see this many cycles. If 
>> not, I wonder if there is some global setting I should set, or something is 
>> off with my data. I can certainly supply the data if needed.
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> --Taosheng
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/25/2013 06:50 PM, Donna Dierker wrote:
>>> Hmmm.  Your results look great, but 144 cycles of spherical morphing is 
>>> certainly not normal.  I think the line in the script that does this is 
>>> this one:
>>> 
>>>    #MULTIRESOLUTION MORPHING
>>>    caret_command -surface-sphere-multi-morph $SPEC $FIDUCIAL_MWS 
>>> $SPHERE_MWS $TOPO
>>> 
>>> There are no parameters for this one; they are built in, apparently, so I'm 
>>> not sure what could be going on.
>>> 
>>> I'm stumped.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Taosheng Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Donna,
>>>> I've been using the preborder and postborder scripts to convert files from 
>>>> FreeSurfer to Caret (hope you still remember I was involved in early 
>>>> testing of these scripts). Things  have been working great. I haven't done 
>>>> this for a while, but recently I changed computer and installed the 
>>>> current version of Caret and these scripts, and there seems to be some 
>>>> difference in how the code works. I just want to make sure this is 
>>>> expected behavior.
>>>> Specifically, when we run postborder script, it takes much longer. It 
>>>> seems either the script or caret_command is doing more iterations, because 
>>>> we now see files like this after the script finishes:
>>>> 
>>>> Human.FS040.L.SPHERICAL.73730.MWS.SPHERE_CYCLE144.coord
>>>> 
>>>> There're a lot of files like this, with consecutive names from CYCLE1 to 
>>>> CYCLE 144, whereas previously it only goes from CYCLE1 to CYCLE4. My 
>>>> question is: is this expected behavior, or is there something wrong in how 
>>>> we ran the scripts?
>>>> I've posted the result from the check_reg here 
>>>> http://psychology.msu.edu/liulab/files/html_out/views.html
>>>> 
>>>> They look just like before, but I'd like to confirm whether this is normal.
>>>> Thank you very much,
>>>> 
>>>> --Taosheng
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Taosheng Liu
>>>> Assistant Professor
>>>> Department of Psychology
>>>> Michigan State University
>>>> 316 Physics Road
>>>> East Lansing, MI 48824
>>>> PH: 517.432.6694
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> caret-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caret-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>> 
>> -- 
>> Taosheng Liu
>> Assistant Professor
>> Department of Psychology
>> Michigan State University
>> 316 Physics Road
>> East Lansing, MI 48824
>> PH: 517.432.6694
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> caret-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> caret-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users


_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

Reply via email to