Alan reminded me I should have given the link to the supplier:
http://www.foxcom.com/index.aspx?id=2510
J
On 18 Dec 2009, at 12:53 AM, Tom Kuiper wrote:
John Ford wrote:
We've decided (Maybe prematurely?) that wide-band analog links are
not the
way to go, for single-dish, at least. The stability we need was
not there
the last time I looked, when you factor in the twisting of the
fibers, the
diurnal temperature variations, etc. Can you give me more info on
these
wideband analog links? It would be much easier for us if they really
worked well at these bandwidths of ~10 GHz.
Glenn is in Green Bank, I believe, but when he sees this thread he
may have something to says about stability concerns at DSS-28 due to
the fibers from receiver at the base of the dish and the DSP
electronics in the antenna pedestal.
In any case, I agree with Jouko that you should bury as many fibers
as you
have money for. The cost of the WDM systems far overshadows the
cost of
fiber at 500 meters. If you were trying to reuse existing
infrastructure,
it would be a different story.
We don't even have to bury the fiber bundle. It just gets strung
alongside all the other cables that are already there.
Cheers
Tom
Justin Jonas
j.jo...@ru.ac.za
