Thanks, Tom, Matt - and yes it is indeed v1.1. Good to hear our plots
are in agreeance.
Cheers
Danny
On 11/03/2010 17:32, Matt Dexter wrote:
Hi,
The term iADC is a bit ambiguous.
Do you mean iADC v1.0 ? or iADC v1.1 ?
Your S11 magnitude plot matches those I made for the iADC v1.1.
AKA http://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ADC2x1000-8 v1.1
yes - a good attenuator at the input will help the match.
Matt Dexter
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Danny Price wrote:
G'day mateys
I've been investigating feeding the iADC directly with a 960-1440MHz
signal; does anyone have any comments/advice about doing so? I was
planning on adding a 10dB attenuator at the input of the iADC to
combat standing waves.
Also, can anyone comment on whether this S11 magnitude plot looks
accurate?
Cheers
Danny
