A follow up question. From the data sheet I've found concerning the 6367555-1, it is not clear what (if anything) the utility contacts need to be attached to. What I read seems like a suggestion that is open to the end application. Can someone enlighten me please?

http://www.tycoelectronics.com/catalog/pn/en/6367555-1

-Dan

Hi Dan,

The 6367555-1 is the right one. It's the same as the 1367555, but "more" RoHS compliant. It has the utility Contacts on the side in addition to the
40 pairs on the 1367130-1.

Regards,
Francois

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Daniel S. Klopp <[email protected]> wrote: I am designing a board with a ZDOK+ connector to interface with an IBOB. According to the wiki http://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/IBOB , it uses a
Tyco ZDOK+ 40 differential pair connector and provides a link to the
website.  Using the datasheet I was under the impression I would use
1367130-1 layout with 40 pairs. But when I measured the dimensions of th=
e
physical board and looked at the pin layout of another connector we have =
in
the lab, it looks as if the correct layout to use is actually 1367555. ht=
tp://www.tycoelectronics.com/commerce/DocumentDelivery/DDEController'636755=
5

?Action=3Dshowdoc&DocId=3DCustomer+Drawing%7F1367555%7FB%7Fpdf%7FEnglish%=
7FENG_CD_1367555_B.pdf%7FN-A<http://www.tycoelectronics.com/commerce/Docume=
ntDelivery/DDEController?Action=3Dshowdoc&DocId=3DCustomer+Drawing%7F136755=
5%7FB%7Fpdf%7FEnglish%7FENG_CD_1367555_B.pdf%7FN-A>. However, that drawing=
 has me a bit nervous as it is a customer provided
document and not an official Tyco document.

Could someone please confirm the EXACT connector layout I should use?

Thank you,
-Dan


--
:(){ :|: & };:





--
:(){ :|: & };:

Reply via email to