Where does Castle.Core fit into the mix? Should it have a project lead or should it be lead by whomever leads MicroKernel or even DynamicProxy since they are pretty closely related.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not a committer, but I'd be interesting in leading the tools (Dynamic > Proxy, NVelocity and Visual Studio wizards) if no one objects and no other > committer really wants them. I don't want to see the few tools we have > falling behind. > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:58 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Following up the last announcement, so far two committers stepped in. >> Some positions are still open: >> >> - ActiveRecord - Markus >> - MonoRail - Ken >> - Windsor - ?? >> - Facilities (step in for one of them if you want) >> - Common Services >> - DynamicProxy >> >> Components >> - Castle Validator >> - DictionaryAdapter >> - Binder >> - Email/TemplateEngine >> - Scheduler >> - Pagination >> >> >> We would expect from the leaders to oversee the development (near and >> long term), set up goals, roadmaps, coordinate the documentation >> effort and release it. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Jonathon Rossi > -- Jonathon Rossi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
