That sounds fair. Once we prove we can actually lead the project the PMC can consider committer rights.
Maybe a committer can work with Richard to lead MK/Windsor. My question on Castle.Core before probably got lost in all the replies. Any comments? My thoughts are that Castle Core probably shouldn't go with MK/Windsor because it is already a big enough task for some to lead. Since NHibernate uses Core and DP2, they are going to have to stay in sync so we don't cause problems for the NHibernate guys. I'd be happy to add it to the tools I offered leading so that it can be released in sync with DP2, maybe even together. On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:39 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we can _try_ giving non-committers leadship of some projects. > In your case Richard, I'd ask you to pick something smaller than the > MK/Windsor, though, as we are getting to know you. > > Unless agreed differently I'd also not consider giving committer > access to non-committers leaders for now. You can send the patches > (cc'ing me) and I'll apply them in the meantime. > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Richard Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > That's kind of how I felt about offering to lead on Microkernel and > > Windsor, but at least I'm not alone in being a non-committer making an > > offer now :). > > > > Thanks, > > Rick Fleming > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Ken, > >> > >> I was concerned I might be pushing in on others that would want to lead > >> those. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for Jono from me. > >>> > >>> I'll also be taking the Tools.CodeGenerator, as I'm thinking about > merging > >>> it into MonoRail anyway as it's not really an external tool, but is > specific > >>> to MonoRail, and I upgrades the MR experience. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm not a committer, but I'd be interesting in leading the tools > (Dynamic > >>>> Proxy, NVelocity and Visual Studio wizards) if no one objects and no > other > >>>> committer really wants them. I don't want to see the few tools we have > >>>> falling behind. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:58 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Following up the last announcement, so far two committers stepped in. > >>>>> Some positions are still open: > >>>>> > >>>>> - ActiveRecord - Markus > >>>>> - MonoRail - Ken > >>>>> - Windsor - ?? > >>>>> - Facilities (step in for one of them if you want) > >>>>> - Common Services > >>>>> - DynamicProxy > >>>>> > >>>>> Components > >>>>> - Castle Validator > >>>>> - DictionaryAdapter > >>>>> - Binder > >>>>> - Email/TemplateEngine > >>>>> - Scheduler > >>>>> - Pagination > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> We would expect from the leaders to oversee the development (near and > >>>>> long term), set up goals, roadmaps, coordinate the documentation > >>>>> effort and release it. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> hammett > >>>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jonathon Rossi > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ken Egozi. > >>> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog > >>> http://www.musicglue.com > >>> http://www.castleproject.org > >>> http://www.gotfriends.co.il > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jonathon Rossi > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > -- Jonathon Rossi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
