Sure, makes sense since most of Core is supporting MK. DP2 can just be released with the last release of Core.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:17 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For simplicity's sake it should go with MK/Windsor. I think it will > end up to me to lead that as well. > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > That sounds fair. Once we prove we can actually lead the project the PMC > can > > consider committer rights. > > > > Maybe a committer can work with Richard to lead MK/Windsor. > > > > My question on Castle.Core before probably got lost in all the replies. > Any > > comments? My thoughts are that Castle Core probably shouldn't go with > > MK/Windsor because it is already a big enough task for some to lead. > Since > > NHibernate uses Core and DP2, they are going to have to stay in sync so > we > > don't cause problems for the NHibernate guys. I'd be happy to add it to > the > > tools I offered leading so that it can be released in sync with DP2, > maybe > > even together. > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > -- Jonathon Rossi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
