Yer, I fixed those last night. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Peter W <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK. But currently the trunk can't build a .NET 2.0 version of > Castle.Core due to a dependency on ExtensionAttribute and > ReaderWriterLockSlim both of which are defined in System.Core. You're > probably aware of these problems, but I thought I'd better point them > out just in case. > > Peter. > > On Jan 22, 1:55 am, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Basically, the .NET 2.0 branch is there for anyone that still needs to > use > > .NET 2.0, since everyone is moving on with .net 3.5 in the trunk, however > > I'm sure committers are still willing to apply patches to it. The branch > > will just turn into whatever it needs to be to provide Castle to those > > users. > > > > At this stage I'm planning on releasing the .net 2.0 Castle.Core and DP2 > > from the trunk. I'd really prefer not doing it from the net-2.0 branch > > because both the 2.0 and 3.5 releases should be as close as possible from > a > > public API view. It also means bug fixes only have to go into the trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Peter W <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Jonathon. > > > > > That works for me, as I'm mostly interested in Castle.Core and DP2 > > > anyway. So, the .NET 2.0 build for NHibernate will be built from this > > > branch? I ask because I'm a little unclear on the precise reason for > > > the NH2.0 branch, but I assume that it exists more for ActiveRecords > > > sake than for NHibernates. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Peter. > > > > > On Jan 21, 10:03 am, "Jonathon Rossi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am not aware of any committer that is actively using the net 2.0 > > > branch. > > > > However, if you submit patches to fix bugs or backport a feature > > > available > > > > in the trunk (net 3.5), then I sure a committer will apply it. > > > > > > The branch is there to allow those that still need to use .net 2.0, > > > however > > > > the decision was made to move on and require .net 3.5 for the trunk > and > > > > future releases (there is an exception to that rule with Castle.Core > and > > > DP2 > > > > which we still intend to ship a .net 2.0 build for NHibernate). > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Peter Wain < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Regarding the recent .NET 2.0 branch at: > > > > > > >https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/branches/net-2.0-trunk > > > > > > > Does anyone know if this will be kept in any kind of synch with the > > > trunk? > > > > > Maybe just bug fixes? > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Peter. > > > > > > -- > > > > Jonathon Rossi- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > Jono- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- Jonathon Rossi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
