Thanks Jonathon - you've been a big help.
On Jan 23, 11:45 am, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:
> At this stage I don't know. I'll try to keep them .net 2.0 buildable as long
> as it is feasible. At this stage I can't forsee any reason that we would
> need to break .net 2.0 support.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Peter W <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Cool. One final question: Are the trunk versions of Castle.Core and
> > DP2 likely to stay .NET2.0 compilable for the forseeable future? Or
> > just until the next release of NHibernate has been bedded down?
>
> > On Jan 22, 6:27 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Yer, I fixed those last night.
>
> > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Peter W <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > OK. But currently the trunk can't build a .NET 2.0 version of
> > > > Castle.Core due to a dependency on ExtensionAttribute and
> > > > ReaderWriterLockSlim both of which are defined in System.Core. You're
> > > > probably aware of these problems, but I thought I'd better point them
> > > > out just in case.
>
> > > > Peter.
>
> > > > On Jan 22, 1:55 am, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Basically, the .NET 2.0 branch is there for anyone that still needs
> > to
> > > > use
> > > > > .NET 2.0, since everyone is moving on with .net 3.5 in the trunk,
> > however
> > > > > I'm sure committers are still willing to apply patches to it. The
> > branch
> > > > > will just turn into whatever it needs to be to provide Castle to
> > those
> > > > > users.
>
> > > > > At this stage I'm planning on releasing the .net 2.0 Castle.Core and
> > DP2
> > > > > from the trunk. I'd really prefer not doing it from the net-2.0
> > branch
> > > > > because both the 2.0 and 3.5 releases should be as close as possible
> > from
> > > > a
> > > > > public API view. It also means bug fixes only have to go into the
> > trunk.
>
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Peter W <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Thanks Jonathon.
>
> > > > > > That works for me, as I'm mostly interested in Castle.Core and DP2
> > > > > > anyway. So, the .NET 2.0 build for NHibernate will be built from
> > this
> > > > > > branch? I ask because I'm a little unclear on the precise reason
> > for
> > > > > > the NH2.0 branch, but I assume that it exists more for
> > ActiveRecords
> > > > > > sake than for NHibernates.
>
> > > > > > Cheers,
>
> > > > > > Peter.
>
> > > > > > On Jan 21, 10:03 am, "Jonathon Rossi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > I am not aware of any committer that is actively using the net
> > 2.0
> > > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > However, if you submit patches to fix bugs or backport a feature
> > > > > > available
> > > > > > > in the trunk (net 3.5), then I sure a committer will apply it.
>
> > > > > > > The branch is there to allow those that still need to use .net
> > 2.0,
> > > > > > however
> > > > > > > the decision was made to move on and require .net 3.5 for the
> > trunk
> > > > and
> > > > > > > future releases (there is an exception to that rule with
> > Castle.Core
> > > > and
> > > > > > DP2
> > > > > > > which we still intend to ship a .net 2.0 build for NHibernate).
>
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Peter Wain <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > > > Regarding the recent .NET 2.0 branch at:
>
> > > > > > > >https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/branches/net-2.0-trunk
>
> > > > > > > > Does anyone know if this will be kept in any kind of synch with
> > the
> > > > > > trunk?
> > > > > > > > Maybe just bug fixes?
>
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > > > > > Peter.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jonathon Rossi- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > Jonathon Rossi- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Jonathon Rossi- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
