That was a point when separating pagination from MR, I would like AR (and more) interact with it
On Feb 15, 12:18 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > Pagination can be used from any client, not necessarily MR. > could even be used in non-web scenarios > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Partly because Windsor is more interesting :). The other part is that I'm > > not too sure how many people would use a pagination release without > > MonoRail. So it is more likely they will just use MR and Pagination off the > > trunk until they are both together as a release. > > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Colin Ramsay <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> > When the first person is ready to release a project we will need to work > >> out > >> > what needs to go on the castle web site. > > >> I was ready a little while back but I found it hard to attract comment: > > >>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/t... > > >> I think it's cos Windsor is inherently more interesting than Pagination ;) > > >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > I think it might be best hosting the downloads on sourceforge. This > >> would > >> > mean more people need write access to it. The main reason is that there > >> is > >> > actually heaps of bandwidth currently used for RC3. January 2009 had > >> 42.9 GB > >> > downloaded and I would expect that once there are more releases that is > >> only > >> > going to increase. Sourceforge has the infrastructure to handle the > >> load. > > >>http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=124416&ugn=c... > > >> > I'd expect the package for MR to include AR and MK. For example, because > >> the > >> > current MR release might not yet be using the latest released AR. I can > >> see > >> > having a full castle package of the current releases that are all > >> compatible > >> > which you can just download and be done with it a really good idea. > > >> > When the first person is ready to release a project we will need to work > >> out > >> > what needs to go on the castle web site. > > >> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Colin Ramsay <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > > >> >> We also need to decide/find out where downloads are going to be hosted. > > >> >> My other slight concern is how to createa synchronised download for > >> >> people who want a "full suite" of Castle stuff. For example, if we all > >> >> release separately then a user would have to download all the > >> >> Components separately, then MR, then Windsor, etc, etc. I know this > >> >> isn't specific to Windsor but I wanted to raise it anyway. > > >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Can we make a decision about version numbers for the next release. > > >> >> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> :) > > >> >> >> We'll I was close, it was about going with DP 2.1 instead of 2.0. > >> I'd > >> >> >> expect you'd want to follow the same convention for the rest of the > >> >> >> projects. However, maybe not. > > >> >> >> These are 2 quotes from a discussion about releasing DP 2.0: > > >> >> >>> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking into 2.1 > >> or > >> >> >>> 2.0.1 > > >> >> >>> I'd vote for 2.1 > >> >> >>> 2.0 is very stable. > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thr... > > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:26 AM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >>> I have no recollection of saying that :-) > > >> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected] > > >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> - increase the version number (1.0.4.revision) to help > >> distinctify > >> >> >>> >> RC3+ > >> >> >>> >> from RTM+ > > >> >> >>> > I remember Hammett mentioning at some point he suggested just > >> >> >>> > jumping > >> >> >>> > to 1.1 > >> >> >>> > to make it really clear, since 1.0 has basically been a 2 year > >> >> >>> > rolling > >> >> >>> > release off the trunk. What do you think? > > >> >> >>> > -- > >> >> >>> > Jono > > >> >> >>> -- > >> >> >>> Cheers, > >> >> >>> hammett > >> >> >>>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Jono > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Jono > > >> > -- > >> > Jono > > > -- > > Jono > > -- > Ken > Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
