I can provide an S3 account to put them there.1.5 ? On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Agreed. Once we get started with projects having regular releases it will > be smoother. It is just up to someone to start :) > > Does anyone else (including other projects leaders) have an opinion on > where we should store the downloads (sf.net is good because we don't need > to worry about FTP access to the cp site). > > Also what is everyone's opinion on version numbers for the next releases. > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gauthier Segay <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> That was a point when separating pagination from MR, I would like AR >> (and more) interact with it >> >> On Feb 15, 12:18 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Pagination can be used from any client, not necessarily MR. >> > could even be used in non-web scenarios >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > Partly because Windsor is more interesting :). The other part is that >> I'm >> > > not too sure how many people would use a pagination release without >> > > MonoRail. So it is more likely they will just use MR and Pagination >> off the >> > > trunk until they are both together as a release. >> > >> > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Colin Ramsay <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> > >> > When the first person is ready to release a project we will need to >> work >> > >> out >> > >> > what needs to go on the castle web site. >> > >> > >> I was ready a little while back but I found it hard to attract >> comment: >> > >> > >> >> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/t... >> > >> > >> I think it's cos Windsor is inherently more interesting than >> Pagination ;) >> > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected] >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > I think it might be best hosting the downloads on sourceforge. This >> > >> would >> > >> > mean more people need write access to it. The main reason is that >> there >> > >> is >> > >> > actually heaps of bandwidth currently used for RC3. January 2009 >> had >> > >> 42.9 GB >> > >> > downloaded and I would expect that once there are more releases >> that is >> > >> only >> > >> > going to increase. Sourceforge has the infrastructure to handle the >> > >> load. >> > >> > >> >> http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=124416&ugn=c... >> > >> > >> > I'd expect the package for MR to include AR and MK. For example, >> because >> > >> the >> > >> > current MR release might not yet be using the latest released AR. I >> can >> > >> see >> > >> > having a full castle package of the current releases that are all >> > >> compatible >> > >> > which you can just download and be done with it a really good idea. >> > >> > >> > When the first person is ready to release a project we will need to >> work >> > >> out >> > >> > what needs to go on the castle web site. >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Colin Ramsay < >> [email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> We also need to decide/find out where downloads are going to be >> hosted. >> > >> > >> >> My other slight concern is how to createa synchronised download >> for >> > >> >> people who want a "full suite" of Castle stuff. For example, if we >> all >> > >> >> release separately then a user would have to download all the >> > >> >> Components separately, then MR, then Windsor, etc, etc. I know >> this >> > >> >> isn't specific to Windsor but I wanted to raise it anyway. >> > >> > >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jonathon Rossi < >> [email protected]> >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > Can we make a decision about version numbers for the next >> release. >> > >> > >> >> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Jonathon Rossi < >> [email protected]> >> > >> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> >> >> :) >> > >> > >> >> >> We'll I was close, it was about going with DP 2.1 instead of >> 2.0. >> > >> I'd >> > >> >> >> expect you'd want to follow the same convention for the rest of >> the >> > >> >> >> projects. However, maybe not. >> > >> > >> >> >> These are 2 quotes from a discussion about releasing DP 2.0: >> > >> > >> >> >>> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking into >> 2.1 >> > >> or >> > >> >> >>> 2.0.1 >> > >> > >> >> >>> I'd vote for 2.1 >> > >> >> >>> 2.0 is very stable. >> > >> > >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thr... >> > >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:26 AM, hammett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> >>> I have no recollection of saying that :-) >> > >> > >> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Jonathon Rossi < >> [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> >>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> >> - increase the version number (1.0.4.revision) to help >> > >> distinctify >> > >> >> >>> >> RC3+ >> > >> >> >>> >> from RTM+ >> > >> > >> >> >>> > I remember Hammett mentioning at some point he suggested >> just >> > >> >> >>> > jumping >> > >> >> >>> > to 1.1 >> > >> >> >>> > to make it really clear, since 1.0 has basically been a 2 >> year >> > >> >> >>> > rolling >> > >> >> >>> > release off the trunk. What do you think? >> > >> > >> >> >>> > -- >> > >> >> >>> > Jono >> > >> > >> >> >>> -- >> > >> >> >>> Cheers, >> > >> >> >>> hammett >> > >> >> >>>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> > >> > >> >> > -- >> > >> >> > Jono >> > >> > >> >> > -- >> > >> >> > Jono >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Jono >> > >> > > -- >> > > Jono >> > >> > -- >> > Ken Egozi. >> http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il >> >> > > > -- > Jono > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
