+1 for 2.0

Ernst

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Courtney Shrock <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Been following the thread and agree that 2.0 is best overall solution.
> For me, software development has never been linear progression.
>
> Ayende Rahien wrote:
> > Everyone,
> >
> > We are trying to reach an agreement about what the release version
> > number should be for all the projects.
> > The following suggestions has been brought up:
> >
> > a) 1.0
> > b) 1.5
> > c) 2.0
> > d) something else
> >
> > Full discussion of those alternative can be found in the Releasing
> > Windsor thread
> > (
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/ebf70bdff76dde66?hl=en
> )
> >
> > Votes?
> >
> > >
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to