++ Ken's response

I'd be happy seeing any version number for any product that finally
puts a line in the sand that we can all work against.


 - b


On Feb 24, 9:24 am, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > well actually I don't give a rat's arse about this.
> > who cares?
>
> > I'd say that it should be up to project leads.
>
> > DP is 2.0 for quite some time, so I guess it'd be kept like that
> > AR can be 1.0 as Markus wishes (and there isn't much API difference from
> > RC3 anyway)
> > MR is *way* different than RC3 so a 2.0 does make sense
> > Windsor is with quite the same xml API, but a with a huge bust of Fluent
> > and binsor, so 1.5 could make sense, but 1.0 (cuz it backwards compat) and
> > 2.0 (cuz it's way cooler now) could also work.
>
> > I say => let the PMC decide between the two options:
> > 1. a relese no. for all projects
> > or
> > 2. letting project leads decide.
>
> I think Ken is on to something here. We keep forgetting each project is now
> released separately, so why not just make the leads pick the next version
> number as Ken suggested. 1.0 makes sense for just about everything except a
> few projects which have changed quite a lot. And new projects that weren't
> around in RC3 (e.g. Pagination and Scheduler components) can start at 1.0.
>
> Because the version number really doesn't matter that much it might just be
> best getting the leads to decide what makes sense for the project and be
> done with it.
>
> > We are putting way too much effort on that.  I'd rather all that energy be
> > put into better things. VS wizards for MR anyone?
>
> I tried that angle before, no one offered :)
>
> --
> Jono
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to