1.0 -Markus
2009/2/23 Ernst Naezer <[email protected]>: > +1 for 2.0 > > Ernst > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Courtney Shrock <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Been following the thread and agree that 2.0 is best overall solution. >> For me, software development has never been linear progression. >> >> Ayende Rahien wrote: >> > Everyone, >> > >> > We are trying to reach an agreement about what the release version >> > number should be for all the projects. >> > The following suggestions has been brought up: >> > >> > a) 1.0 >> > b) 1.5 >> > c) 2.0 >> > d) something else >> > >> > Full discussion of those alternative can be found in the Releasing >> > Windsor thread >> > >> > (http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/ebf70bdff76dde66?hl=en) >> > >> > Votes? >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
