Because this discussion has gone cold and no one objected to just letting the project leaders decide what is best for their project, I think that is the way we are going to go. All the projects are not going to be released at the same time so they don't need to have the same version number to start with.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Colin Ramsay <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree. Perhaps there just needs to be a vote, with a cut off point? > Either just from participants in this thread or members of the PMC. > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Brian DeMarzo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ++ Ken's response > > > > I'd be happy seeing any version number for any product that finally > > puts a line in the sand that we can all work against. > > > > > > - b > > > > > > On Feb 24, 9:24 am, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > well actually I don't give a rat's arse about this. > >> > who cares? > >> > >> > I'd say that it should be up to project leads. > >> > >> > DP is 2.0 for quite some time, so I guess it'd be kept like that > >> > AR can be 1.0 as Markus wishes (and there isn't much API difference > from > >> > RC3 anyway) > >> > MR is *way* different than RC3 so a 2.0 does make sense > >> > Windsor is with quite the same xml API, but a with a huge bust of > Fluent > >> > and binsor, so 1.5 could make sense, but 1.0 (cuz it backwards compat) > and > >> > 2.0 (cuz it's way cooler now) could also work. > >> > >> > I say => let the PMC decide between the two options: > >> > 1. a relese no. for all projects > >> > or > >> > 2. letting project leads decide. > >> > >> I think Ken is on to something here. We keep forgetting each project is > now > >> released separately, so why not just make the leads pick the next > version > >> number as Ken suggested. 1.0 makes sense for just about everything > except a > >> few projects which have changed quite a lot. And new projects that > weren't > >> around in RC3 (e.g. Pagination and Scheduler components) can start at > 1.0. > >> > >> Because the version number really doesn't matter that much it might just > be > >> best getting the leads to decide what makes sense for the project and be > >> done with it. > >> > >> > We are putting way too much effort on that. I'd rather all that > energy be > >> > put into better things. VS wizards for MR anyone? > >> > >> I tried that angle before, no one offered :) > >> > >> -- > >> Jono > > > > > > > > > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
