Hi, I have a version that has NAnt and NUnit embedded and has a simple batch file (build.cmd) to drive the build. Any objections to committing it?
Cheers, Roelof. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Robinson <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 then -- > if you'd like some testing help let me know. > > matt > > On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Tim Barcz wrote: > > Basically what'd I'd do is bring in nant and any external libraries that > are needed (nunit is another one I can think of) and provide batch files for > the most common scenarios. The idea would be to non-invasive on the build > file itself, that's I'd like to leave alone for the reasons you pointed > out. I only want to reduce friction around the current build file/process. > > Tim > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matt Robinson > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> what files in the current build setup would this affect? the nature of >> the castle .build files makes it easy to do complicated things (castle >> dynproxy -> nhibernate -> rhino tools / full castle -> your in-house code), >> so I'd only be worried if this would somehow remove the current >> "hookability", if that makes any sense? >> >> On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Tim Barcz wrote: >> >> I am more than willing to get this up and running for major areas of the >> build if you all will let me. I have this on our build here at work where >> everything is referenced relatively. The goal is that the users/developers >> should be able to get source and get up and running very very quickly. >> >> Despite how this sounds, I see this as being very non-invasive and quick >> to do. I'd love to contribute if you guys approve this. >> >> Tim >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Julian Birch <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Consider this a +1. >>> >>> I actually wrote a program to do this, I got so bored with all of the >>> various bits you need to get/know. Keep meaning to turn it into something >>> someone else could use. It downloads Nant, Nunit and the rest. >>> Julian. >>> >>> 2009/2/11 Daniel Hölbling <[email protected]> >>> >>> I'd really love to see that since I have failed miserably to compile >>>> Castle from source last week. >>>> >>>> Some way to easily compile the source would be great. (Especially since >>>> I often hop machines and keeping all build tools in sync is quite >>>> challenging) >>>> >>>> Greetings, Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bill Barry <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> hink there should be a text file there containing instructions to get >>>>> the Nant sour >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
