Hi, No, I committed my local stuff. But thanks for the patch, it triggered me to commit this stuff. Run the new build.cmd script to use the embedded NAnt and NUnit.
-- Roelof. On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't this what I committed? Has the patch been applied? > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a version that has NAnt and NUnit embedded and has a simple batch >> file (build.cmd) to drive the build. Any objections to committing it? >> >> Cheers, >> Roelof. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Robinson >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> +1 then -- >>> if you'd like some testing help let me know. >>> >>> matt >>> >>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>> >>> Basically what'd I'd do is bring in nant and any external libraries that >>> are needed (nunit is another one I can think of) and provide batch files for >>> the most common scenarios. The idea would be to non-invasive on the build >>> file itself, that's I'd like to leave alone for the reasons you pointed >>> out. I only want to reduce friction around the current build file/process. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matt Robinson <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> what files in the current build setup would this affect? the nature of >>>> the castle .build files makes it easy to do complicated things (castle >>>> dynproxy -> nhibernate -> rhino tools / full castle -> your in-house code), >>>> so I'd only be worried if this would somehow remove the current >>>> "hookability", if that makes any sense? >>>> >>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>> >>>> I am more than willing to get this up and running for major areas of the >>>> build if you all will let me. I have this on our build here at work where >>>> everything is referenced relatively. The goal is that the users/developers >>>> should be able to get source and get up and running very very quickly. >>>> >>>> Despite how this sounds, I see this as being very non-invasive and quick >>>> to do. I'd love to contribute if you guys approve this. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Julian Birch >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Consider this a +1. >>>>> >>>>> I actually wrote a program to do this, I got so bored with all of the >>>>> various bits you need to get/know. Keep meaning to turn it into something >>>>> someone else could use. It downloads Nant, Nunit and the rest. >>>>> Julian. >>>>> >>>>> 2009/2/11 Daniel Hölbling <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> I'd really love to see that since I have failed miserably to compile >>>>>> Castle from source last week. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some way to easily compile the source would be great. (Especially >>>>>> since I often hop machines and keeping all build tools in sync is quite >>>>>> challenging) >>>>>> >>>>>> Greetings, Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bill Barry >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> hink there should be a text file there containing instructions to get >>>>>>> the Nant sour >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
