Hi Tim, It *is* fixed, but running some random build script without reading 'How to build.txt' will get you into trouble, like kzu demonstrated by twittering.
Like I wrote earlier, run the new *build.cmd* script, for instance 'build.cmd quick build'. Please let me know it this works for you. -- Roelof. On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure where things stand but I STILL cannot build when pulling > directly from source. I am not the only one either, this is last night on > twitter. > > http://m.twitter.com/kzu/status/1399399001: > > get castle trunk, run included release.cmd => "'nant' is not recognized >> blah blah...". #FAIL > > > Can we get this fixed ASAP? I don't understand why we can't reduce the > friction for building. > > Tim > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No, I committed my local stuff. But thanks for the patch, it triggered me >> to commit this stuff. Run the new build.cmd script to use the embedded NAnt >> and NUnit. >> >> -- Roelof. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Isn't this what I committed? Has the patch been applied? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a version that has NAnt and NUnit embedded and has a simple batch >>>> file (build.cmd) to drive the build. Any objections to committing it? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Roelof. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Robinson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 then -- >>>>> if you'd like some testing help let me know. >>>>> >>>>> matt >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Basically what'd I'd do is bring in nant and any external libraries >>>>> that are needed (nunit is another one I can think of) and provide batch >>>>> files for the most common scenarios. The idea would be to non-invasive on >>>>> the build file itself, that's I'd like to leave alone for the reasons you >>>>> pointed out. I only want to reduce friction around the current build >>>>> file/process. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matt Robinson < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> what files in the current build setup would this affect? the nature >>>>>> of the castle .build files makes it easy to do complicated things (castle >>>>>> dynproxy -> nhibernate -> rhino tools / full castle -> your in-house >>>>>> code), >>>>>> so I'd only be worried if this would somehow remove the current >>>>>> "hookability", if that makes any sense? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am more than willing to get this up and running for major areas of >>>>>> the build if you all will let me. I have this on our build here at work >>>>>> where everything is referenced relatively. The goal is that the >>>>>> users/developers should be able to get source and get up and running very >>>>>> very quickly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Despite how this sounds, I see this as being very non-invasive and >>>>>> quick to do. I'd love to contribute if you guys approve this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Julian Birch < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Consider this a +1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I actually wrote a program to do this, I got so bored with all of the >>>>>>> various bits you need to get/know. Keep meaning to turn it into >>>>>>> something >>>>>>> someone else could use. It downloads Nant, Nunit and the rest. >>>>>>> Julian. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2009/2/11 Daniel Hölbling <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd really love to see that since I have failed miserably to compile >>>>>>>> Castle from source last week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some way to easily compile the source would be great. (Especially >>>>>>>> since I often hop machines and keeping all build tools in sync is quite >>>>>>>> challenging) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Greetings, Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bill Barry < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> hink there should be a text file there containing instructions to >>>>>>>>> get the Nant sour >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
