But perhaps we should change release.cmd to call build.cmd quick release clean build.
-Markus 2009/3/27 Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > Hi Tim, > > It *is* fixed, but running some random build script without reading 'How to > build.txt' will get you into trouble, like kzu demonstrated by twittering. > > Like I wrote earlier, run the new *build.cmd* script, for instance > 'build.cmd quick build'. > > Please let me know it this works for you. > > -- Roelof. > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not sure where things stand but I STILL cannot build when pulling >> directly from source. I am not the only one either, this is last night on >> twitter. >> >> http://m.twitter.com/kzu/status/1399399001: >> >> get castle trunk, run included release.cmd => "'nant' is not recognized >>> blah blah...". #FAIL >> >> >> Can we get this fixed ASAP? I don't understand why we can't reduce the >> friction for building. >> >> Tim >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> No, I committed my local stuff. But thanks for the patch, it triggered me >>> to commit this stuff. Run the new build.cmd script to use the embedded NAnt >>> and NUnit. >>> >>> -- Roelof. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't this what I committed? Has the patch been applied? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have a version that has NAnt and NUnit embedded and has a simple >>>>> batch file (build.cmd) to drive the build. Any objections to committing >>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Roelof. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Robinson < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 then -- >>>>>> if you'd like some testing help let me know. >>>>>> >>>>>> matt >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Basically what'd I'd do is bring in nant and any external libraries >>>>>> that are needed (nunit is another one I can think of) and provide batch >>>>>> files for the most common scenarios. The idea would be to non-invasive >>>>>> on >>>>>> the build file itself, that's I'd like to leave alone for the reasons you >>>>>> pointed out. I only want to reduce friction around the current build >>>>>> file/process. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matt Robinson < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> what files in the current build setup would this affect? the nature >>>>>>> of the castle .build files makes it easy to do complicated things >>>>>>> (castle >>>>>>> dynproxy -> nhibernate -> rhino tools / full castle -> your in-house >>>>>>> code), >>>>>>> so I'd only be worried if this would somehow remove the current >>>>>>> "hookability", if that makes any sense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am more than willing to get this up and running for major areas of >>>>>>> the build if you all will let me. I have this on our build here at work >>>>>>> where everything is referenced relatively. The goal is that the >>>>>>> users/developers should be able to get source and get up and running >>>>>>> very >>>>>>> very quickly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Despite how this sounds, I see this as being very non-invasive and >>>>>>> quick to do. I'd love to contribute if you guys approve this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Julian Birch < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Consider this a +1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I actually wrote a program to do this, I got so bored with all of >>>>>>>> the various bits you need to get/know. Keep meaning to turn it into >>>>>>>> something someone else could use. It downloads Nant, Nunit and the >>>>>>>> rest. >>>>>>>> Julian. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2009/2/11 Daniel Hölbling <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd really love to see that since I have failed miserably to >>>>>>>>> compile Castle from source last week. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some way to easily compile the source would be great. (Especially >>>>>>>>> since I often hop machines and keeping all build tools in sync is >>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>> challenging) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Greetings, Daniel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bill Barry < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> hink there should be a text file there containing instructions to >>>>>>>>>> get the Nant sour >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
