OK, so what am I doing wrong? I've got TortoiseGIT installed, I've a
folder called "castle" into which I've done a "Git Clone" from
"git://github.com/castleproject/castle.git" which downloaded a couple
of the projects.
Then I read message about a new project being migrated, so I do a Git
Sync on that folder.... And it tells me nothing has changed.
Truth,
James
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:24 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> And copy the buildscripts too, don't use submodules.
>
> John
>
> On Feb 24, 5:57 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mauricio Scheffer <
>>
>>
>>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > inline
>>
>> > On Feb 23, 9:43 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > The 'problem' is twofold:
>>
>> > > 1. When we used svn we did this with svn:externals on the tools
>> > > directory:
>> > > *^/buildtools/NUnit/2.5.3/ NUnit
>> > > ^/buildtools/MSBuildCommunityTasks/r492/ MSBuildCommunityTasks*
>> > > This way you got get two folders named *NUnit* and
>> > *MSBuildCommunityTasks
>> > > *below the tools folder,
>> > > and you could reference these from scripts. Notice how both point to a
>> > > specific version (url really).
>> > > I am pretty sure Git cannot do this.
>>
>> > Not sure I understand... you *can* point a submodule to any commit you
>> > want.
>>
>> I know, but you cannot point to a path *in* the repository. Call it deep
>> linking if you want, something that svn supports.
>> AFAIK, you can only get the whole repository.
>>
>>
>>
>> > > 2. The other is the not-so-obvious 'git submodule init;git submodule
>> > > update', especially when you switch between branches
>> > > this is non-trivial and easy to forget. At least this is what I
>> > > understood from googling a bit, and the last section of
>> > > http://progit.org/book/ch6-6.html
>>
>> > Yes, but I think this is a very rare case... I don't think we will
>> > have branches pointing to different commits of a submodule.
>>
>> True.
>> However if you currently clone a Castle project, you have to get the
>> buildscripts module separately (git submodule update). I'd rather just clone
>> the repository and be done.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > > In addition, to update a submodule reference over the projects you need
>> > to
>> > > update (git checkout master, git pull, git push) on every submodule in
>> > every
>> > > project because, unlike in svn, the head cannot be automatically tracked.
>> > I
>> > > guess it's just as easy (easier?) to update that shared thing on all your
>> > > local git clones and push them.
>>
>> > > With the projects being split there's no real story to keep all things
>> > equal
>> > > for all projects, IMHO.
>>
>> > I agree. IMHO this is just like binary dependencies (i.e. each project
>> > controls its own dependencies, including buildscripts).
>>
>> > So what do we do about buildtools? Submodule them? Copy them?
>>
>> Copy them.
>>
>>
>>
>> > > -- Roelof.
>>
>> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Mauricio Scheffer <
>>
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > I didn't have any issues with the buildscripts submodule... what was
>> > > > the problem with buildtools?
>>
>> > > > On Feb 23, 1:48 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > Re the use of submodules, so how come we are using them for the
>> > > > > buildscripts?
>>
>> > > > > Cheers
>> > > > > John
>>
>> > > > > On Feb 22, 10:58 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > Inline
>>
>> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, John Simons <
>> > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > Thanks guys, good links :)
>>
>> > > > > > > Re repositories on github, I've noticed we've added a submodule
>> > for
>> > > > > > > the buildscripts to the already migrated projects, I was
>> > wondering if
>> > > > > > > it makes also sense to add the buildtools(Nant, nunit, ....) as
>> > > > > > > submodules so that we can just clone and build?
>>
>> > > > > > I've tried this but submodules work differently than svn:externals,
>> > and
>> > > > come
>> > > > > > with a whole share of problems, check this out:
>> > > >http://progit.org/book/ch6-6.html
>>
>> > > > > > > Also, the following repositories can be deleted:
>> > > > > > > Castle.Components.EmailSender
>> > > > > > > Castle.Facilities.BatchRegistration
>> > > > > > > Castle.Services.Logging
>> > > > > > > Castle.Facilities.Cache
>> > > > > > > Castle.Services.Transaction
>>
>> > > > > > Will do
>>
>> > > > > > > and finally, the presentation that Krzysztof pointed me to
>> > > > > > > mentions .gitignore file, should we add this file to each
>> > repository
>> > > > > > > to exclude bin, obj,....?
>>
>> > > > > > Yup
>>
>> > > > > > > Cheers
>> > > > > > > John
>>
>> > > > > > > On Feb 22, 7:54 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > John,
>>
>> > > > > > > > watch this presentation:
>> > > > > > >http://jagregory.com/writings/git-e-van-recording/
>>
>> > > > > > > > very good stuff that will kickstart you into using git
>>
>> > > > > > > > On 22 Lut, 08:47, John Simons <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > Mauricio or Henry,
>>
>> > > > > > > > > Can I please have one of you migration "TemplateEngine
>> > > > Component"?
>> > > > > > > > > I would do it, but I have zero experience using git, so I
>> > feel
>> > > > very
>> > > > > > > > > nervous doing it!
>>
>> > > > > > > > > Also, can someone give me some pointers on what to install on
>> > my
>> > > > > > > > > workstation? Do I install both msysgit (any specific
>> > > > configuration or
>> > > > > > > > > just use defaults when installing it) and tortoisegit? Any
>> > advice
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > welcomed :)
>>
>> > > > > > > > > Cheers
>> > > > > > > > > John
>>
>> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:19 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > 10x
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/20 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > I can take care of MR too, if someone doesn't step in.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > > > Henry Conceição
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Ken Egozi <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > any chance someone might be able to do the history
>> > trick
>> > > > for MR?
>> > > > > > > > > > > > all of my spare OSS time is now consumed by performance
>> > > > > > > improvements to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > AspView, which I've been doing on my MR fork @ github
>> > (got
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > love git
>> > > > > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > github). By now I managed to push a complex page with
>> > many,
>> > > > > > > deeply nested
>> > > > > > > > > > > > subviews, from about a second down to the
>> > neighbourhood of
>> > > > > > > 100ms.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > apparently the code I initially transformed from the
>> > old
>> > > > .boo
>> > > > > > > code of
>> > > > > > > > > > > brail,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > plus the tons of naive changes I applied over the
>> > years,
>> > > > was not
>> > > > > > > too good
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Roelof Blom <
>> > > > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Done.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >> git://
>>
>> > github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement.git
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- Roelof.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Henrik Feldt <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> :) When you’ve migrated it
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> From: [email protected]
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> > Behalf
>> > > > Of
>> > > > > > > Roelof
>> > > > > > > > > > > Blom
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Sent: den 19 februari 2010 21:25
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> To: [email protected]
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: So do we GIT now?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> huh?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Henrik Feldt <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Tell me updates as you go, please.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Cheers,
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Henrik
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> From: [email protected]
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> > Behalf
>> > > > Of
>> > > > > > > Roelof
>> > > > > > > > > > > Blom
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Sent: den 19 februari 2010 20:38
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> To: [email protected]
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: So do we GIT now?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> I am currently working on moving the AutoTX facility.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> 2010/2/19 Henry Conceição <[email protected]
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Ok, so I'll continue to move some repos to github.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> I'm planning to move all the facilties on the next
>> > days.
>> > > > Is
>> > > > > > > everybody
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ok with that?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Henry Conceição
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:21 PM, John Simons <
>> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Agree
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Feb 18, 5:19 am, Henry Conceição <
>> > > > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> So, we all agree that one scm is better than two
>> > and
>> > > > there
>> > > > > > > is no
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> problem to have all the history and not only the
>> > > > relevant
>> > > > > > > part for
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> each repo?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> Henry Conceição
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Roelof Blom <
>> > > > > > > [email protected]
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > Inline
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, John Simons
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > <[email protected]>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> Mauricio,
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> All very good points :)
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> Inline
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> Cheers
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> John
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> On Feb 16, 12:29 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <
>> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > * It's simpler to have one SCM than two.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> I agree, but I thought we were going to freeze
>> > svn
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > > make it
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> readonly, or is this not the plan?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > Which thread was that decided on? I don't like
>>
>> ...
>>
>> read more »
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
