You're right about both affirmations. Imho, on the next version, the core should contain only the most basic features and be very extensible. Features like Wizards, Scaffolding or Data Binding should be externalized and much less intrusive than they are today.
Cheers, Henry Conceição On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:37 PM, James Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I like the idea of the massive refactoring for two reasons: > 1) There's a lot in the core that still uses the .NET v1.1 > non-generic collections. It gives the impression that its > "old-fashioned", which is not the feel we want for a "Cutting edge" > alternate to ASP.NET. > > 2) There are a lot of loose-ends, and half-done features in there -- > When I was working on adding Portable Areas, I discovered that 90% of > the most difficult part was already in the core --- it just was being > used to anything. > > Truth, > James > > > > 2010/7/14 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: >> On the roadmap 2.1 thread, John asked me: >> >> "Actually, it would be nice to hear your thoughts on the future of MR? >> The way I see it, MS MVC2 has pretty much caught up with MR features >> and the way things are going MS MVC3 is pretty much going to blow MR >> out of the water, so if we don't do massive refactoring and >> improvements, what should we do?" >> >> I think refactoring the current implementation and try to offer >> similar and/or slightly better implemented features won't be enough. >> Or Monorail 3 turn out to be something really innovative on the .Net >> land or it'll be remembered only as the hippie alternative for that ms >> web framework. Companies and/or people won't buy the risk of trust on >> us or go against the status quo for such small reward. >> >> Do I have an awesome ideia to it? Unfortunately no. Just a few sparse >> thoughts of what Dlr, Conventions, Composition and a more intelligent >> view engine could do, but nothing concrete. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
