Additionally on this, if I change my application extension to .aspx
then the Default.aspx will trigger a " Url smaller than 2 tokens"
exception. I guess this is because of the following code in
OnBeginRequest in RoutingModuleEx:
if (File.Exists(request.PhysicalPath))
{
return; // Possibly requesting a static file, so we skip routing
altogether
}
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still working on this documentation as I think it's useful to have
> something down even if it's going to change in future. I'm looking at
> the default rule:
>
> rules.Add(
> new PatternRoute("/")
> .DefaultForController().Is("staticcontent")
> .DefaultForAction().Is("home")
> );
>
> Obviously this should match thusly:
>
> [TestMethod]
> public void Root()
> {
> RoutingRules.Register(RoutingModuleEx.Engine);
>
> RouteMatch match = RoutingModuleEx.Engine.FindMatch("/",
> CreateGetContext());
>
> Assert.IsNotNull(match);
> Assert.AreEqual("staticcontent", match.Parameters["controller"]);
> Assert.AreEqual("home", match.Parameters["action"]);
> }
>
> The trouble is that when I'm running through IIS I cannot get this to
> match. If I do not have a Default.aspx placeholder, I get a directory
> listing. If I have a Default.aspx then I see the contents of
> Default.aspx. Incidentally the extension i'm using for my application
> is .ashx at the moment.
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it would definitely be of benefit to try and state the problem
>> to provide context to the rest of the documentation, if nothing else,
>> and if that helps define a better solution then that's a good side
>> benefit.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:44 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Given the fact that I've been writing specs for the last 3 months, I
>>> wonder if we should try this for the routing stuff.
>>>
>>> The spec - at least on devdiv - is a definition of behavior, public
>>> API, consideration and issues. It is also used to create the
>>> documentation. Would that lead to waterfalling a supposedly agile
>>> environment? I'm not sure. What I know is that I've spent many hours
>>> writing and refactoring the routing stuff without a clear and
>>> agreeable definition of the whole problem space.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> hammett
>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
