Could be a switch on Routing Engine/routing rule level. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This leads me to the question: should routing be bypassed like this? > Would it be better if there was some kind of check for a matching > route even if the physical file exists? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
