old routing ...
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got that same set up then, Default.aspx as the default document
> in IIS and then the empty file is present. My route is:
>
> rules.Add(
> new PatternRoute("/Default.aspx")
> .DefaultForController().Is("staticcontent")
> .DefaultForAction().Is("home")
> );
>
> This gives me the "Url smaller than 2 tokens" error. I'm using IIS 5.1
> on XP though....
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it's the default document in IIS
> > and there's an empty file with that name in the root.
> >
> > fools IIS6
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you actually have a physical default.aspx page?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > I mapped .aspx to .net (very shared-hosting friendly), then had a rule
> >> > from
> >> > /default.aspx to home/index.aspx
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm pretty sure that with the old routing I mapped everything to
> >> >> *.html (as opposed to *.castle) and then had a rule like:
> >> >>
> >> >> /index.html
> >> >> /home/index.html
> >> >>
> >> >> That allowed my homepage to look like http://www.mysite.com, i.e.
> with
> >> >> no /index.html or /home/index.html when you hit the homepage. In that
> >> >> case I definitely didn't map "*".
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Jimmy Shimizu
> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Don't you need to map * as handler in order to use site-root
> routing?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Colin Ramsay wrote:
> >> >> >> Additionally on this, if I change my application extension to
> .aspx
> >> >> >> then the Default.aspx will trigger a " Url smaller than 2 tokens"
> >> >> >> exception. I guess this is because of the following code in
> >> >> >> OnBeginRequest in RoutingModuleEx:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> if (File.Exists(request.PhysicalPath))
> >> >> >> {
> >> >> >> return; // Possibly requesting a static file, so we skip
> >> >> >> routing
> >> >> >> altogether
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Colin Ramsay
> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> I'm still working on this documentation as I think it's useful to
> >> >> >>> have
> >> >> >>> something down even if it's going to change in future. I'm
> looking
> >> >> >>> at
> >> >> >>> the default rule:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> rules.Add(
> >> >> >>> new PatternRoute("/")
> >> >> >>> .DefaultForController().Is("staticcontent")
> >> >> >>> .DefaultForAction().Is("home")
> >> >> >>> );
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Obviously this should match thusly:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> [TestMethod]
> >> >> >>> public void Root()
> >> >> >>> {
> >> >> >>> RoutingRules.Register(RoutingModuleEx.Engine);
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> RouteMatch match = RoutingModuleEx.Engine.FindMatch("/",
> >> >> >>> CreateGetContext());
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Assert.IsNotNull(match);
> >> >> >>> Assert.AreEqual("staticcontent",
> >> >> >>> match.Parameters["controller"]);
> >> >> >>> Assert.AreEqual("home", match.Parameters["action"]);
> >> >> >>> }
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> The trouble is that when I'm running through IIS I cannot get
> this
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>> match. If I do not have a Default.aspx placeholder, I get a
> >> >> >>> directory
> >> >> >>> listing. If I have a Default.aspx then I see the contents of
> >> >> >>> Default.aspx. Incidentally the extension i'm using for my
> >> >> >>> application
> >> >> >>> is .ashx at the moment.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Colin Ramsay
> >> >> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> I think it would definitely be of benefit to try and state the
> >> >> >>>> problem
> >> >> >>>> to provide context to the rest of the documentation, if nothing
> >> >> >>>> else,
> >> >> >>>> and if that helps define a better solution then that's a good
> side
> >> >> >>>> benefit.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:44 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Given the fact that I've been writing specs for the last 3
> >> >> >>>>> months, I
> >> >> >>>>> wonder if we should try this for the routing stuff.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> The spec - at least on devdiv - is a definition of behavior,
> >> >> >>>>> public
> >> >> >>>>> API, consideration and issues. It is also used to create the
> >> >> >>>>> documentation. Would that lead to waterfalling a supposedly
> agile
> >> >> >>>>> environment? I'm not sure. What I know is that I've spent many
> >> >> >>>>> hours
> >> >> >>>>> writing and refactoring the routing stuff without a clear and
> >> >> >>>>> agreeable definition of the whole problem space.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Thoughts?
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Colin Ramsay
> >> >> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>> Cheers,
> >> >> >>>>> hammett
> >> >> >>>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ken Egozi.
> >> > http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> >> > http://www.delver.com
> >> > http://www.musicglue.com
> >> > http://www.castleproject.org
> >> > http://www.gotfriends.co.il
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ken Egozi.
> > http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> > http://www.delver.com
> > http://www.musicglue.com
> > http://www.castleproject.org
> > http://www.gotfriends.co.il
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>
--
Ken Egozi.
http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
http://www.delver.com
http://www.musicglue.com
http://www.castleproject.org
http://www.gotfriends.co.il
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
