it's the default document in IIS and there's an empty file with that name in the root.
fools IIS6 On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you actually have a physical default.aspx page? > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I mapped .aspx to .net (very shared-hosting friendly), then had a rule > from > > /default.aspx to home/index.aspx > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> I'm pretty sure that with the old routing I mapped everything to > >> *.html (as opposed to *.castle) and then had a rule like: > >> > >> /index.html > >> /home/index.html > >> > >> That allowed my homepage to look like http://www.mysite.com, i.e. with > >> no /index.html or /home/index.html when you hit the homepage. In that > >> case I definitely didn't map "*". > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Jimmy Shimizu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Don't you need to map * as handler in order to use site-root routing? > >> > > >> > Colin Ramsay wrote: > >> >> Additionally on this, if I change my application extension to .aspx > >> >> then the Default.aspx will trigger a " Url smaller than 2 tokens" > >> >> exception. I guess this is because of the following code in > >> >> OnBeginRequest in RoutingModuleEx: > >> >> > >> >> if (File.Exists(request.PhysicalPath)) > >> >> { > >> >> return; // Possibly requesting a static file, so we skip > routing > >> >> altogether > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> I'm still working on this documentation as I think it's useful to > have > >> >>> something down even if it's going to change in future. I'm looking > at > >> >>> the default rule: > >> >>> > >> >>> rules.Add( > >> >>> new PatternRoute("/") > >> >>> .DefaultForController().Is("staticcontent") > >> >>> .DefaultForAction().Is("home") > >> >>> ); > >> >>> > >> >>> Obviously this should match thusly: > >> >>> > >> >>> [TestMethod] > >> >>> public void Root() > >> >>> { > >> >>> RoutingRules.Register(RoutingModuleEx.Engine); > >> >>> > >> >>> RouteMatch match = RoutingModuleEx.Engine.FindMatch("/", > >> >>> CreateGetContext()); > >> >>> > >> >>> Assert.IsNotNull(match); > >> >>> Assert.AreEqual("staticcontent", match.Parameters["controller"]); > >> >>> Assert.AreEqual("home", match.Parameters["action"]); > >> >>> } > >> >>> > >> >>> The trouble is that when I'm running through IIS I cannot get this > to > >> >>> match. If I do not have a Default.aspx placeholder, I get a > directory > >> >>> listing. If I have a Default.aspx then I see the contents of > >> >>> Default.aspx. Incidentally the extension i'm using for my > application > >> >>> is .ashx at the moment. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Colin Ramsay < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> I think it would definitely be of benefit to try and state the > >> >>>> problem > >> >>>> to provide context to the rest of the documentation, if nothing > else, > >> >>>> and if that helps define a better solution then that's a good side > >> >>>> benefit. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:44 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Given the fact that I've been writing specs for the last 3 months, > I > >> >>>>> wonder if we should try this for the routing stuff. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> The spec - at least on devdiv - is a definition of behavior, > public > >> >>>>> API, consideration and issues. It is also used to create the > >> >>>>> documentation. Would that lead to waterfalling a supposedly agile > >> >>>>> environment? I'm not sure. What I know is that I've spent many > hours > >> >>>>> writing and refactoring the routing stuff without a clear and > >> >>>>> agreeable definition of the whole problem space. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thoughts? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Colin Ramsay > >> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -- > >> >>>>> Cheers, > >> >>>>> hammett > >> >>>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Ken Egozi. > > http://www.kenegozi.com/blog > > http://www.delver.com > > http://www.musicglue.com > > http://www.castleproject.org > > http://www.gotfriends.co.il > > > > > > > > > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
