Perhaps it is a good idea to have another mailinglist specifically for the
CVS mail messages. Right now they are absent, and these messages help the
community follow the developments on the Castor project. Hence it encourages
code review and maybe even more patches.
Could this be made possible?
Ciao,
Bart Guijt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Castor JDO Status
> Let me add a vote for splitting the lists - current emails are split
> between the two areas, but most people are probably only interested in
> one area. Castor is a busy list, so cutting the volume in half would be
> a real help.
>
> I'm personally interested in the manual mapping from XML to Java (not as
> much in the code generation from Schema). Is this being actively
> extended by someone now? There are some enhancements I'd like to look
> into implementing. I'd prefer to wait until the 0.9.4 version of the
> code is released before starting work, since it sounds like a lot has
> changed in the current CVS version. Any thoughts on when this might occur?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Dennis
>
> Patrick van Kann wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that the following administrative changes would
> > simplify things considerably
> >
> > 1) Split the JDO list from the XML list.
> > 2) Split the JDO list into a "dev" list and a "user" list
> >
> > Talented, experienced programmers like Bruce, Thomas, the Kevins etc
> > (apologies to anyone I missed by name, you know who you are ;-) would
> > manage the "dev" list which would be limited to advanced questions
> > about the internals, refactoring, feature discussions. The list would
> > be managed by CVS committers.
> >
> > The "user" list would be used to field the questions from "newbies"
> > and could be managed by experienced users who would like to help the
> > Castor JDO project but lack the time and ability to do anything to the
> > internals (I would consider myself to be in this category). If a
> > particularly curly question is asked, it can be "thrown" up to the
> > "dev" list for an answer.
> >
> > This would allow the "dev" team to spend more time on the refactoring
> > and enhancement of the JDO code.
> >
> > But this would only work if sufficient users were willing to take the
> > load of newbie questions away from people like Bruce who tirelessly
> > field these at the moment.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you
> > wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> > unsubscribe castor-dev
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
