I would definitely go for adequate performance (master/detail without n+1 queries) before distributed cache or pluggable lock engine if I have any vote.
Cheers -----Original Message----- From: Ned Wolpert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Strategy Proposal (repost - was: Castor JDO Status) > From: "Thomas Yip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:09:39 -0700 > It seems to me you should have your own implementation > of LockEngine. I am pretty sure it is much easier than > design a pluggable architecture. Yes. That is exactly what I'm looking for. The Lock Engine should be 'plugable', meaning that the castor.properties file should contain the name of the imlementing LockEngine. -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
