-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruce-

I have no problem waiting for the LockEngine 'pluggableness' in a
later version.   It does make it easier to test my changes to the
LockEngine if I could switch them out and make comparisons that way,
though.  But yeah, we can talk about doing this in the refactored
variant, but I really don't see what the big deal is.  (And judging by
Thomas's comments, 

  "Well. I think it is possible and doesn't require too much work." 
(msg07031.html)

he may agree.)  Either way, my primary task is to get removal of
objects working without deadlock.  (I'm going to _try_ to have a
example working this weekend... if the powers that be (my wife) grants
me time to finish what I have. :-) Course, its gotta pass the test
cases....

> Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 21:02:00 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailing-List-Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailing-List-Server: Minimalist v2.2
> 
> This one time, at band camp, Ned Wolpert said:
> 
> NW>Alright, alright... I'll skip the pluggable lock engine. If I'm the
> NW>only one who wants it, then it doesn't make sense.  I'm still going to
> NW>work on the object removal from the cache, and make sure the lock
> NW>engine is involved in that process.  (Just remember folks, its not
> NW>hard to make the Lock Engine pluggable... just create a factory that
> NW>returns a LockEngine implementation, and read the name of the
> NW>implementation from the properties file)
> 
> I think that a modular architecture is *the* way to go with a
> refactor of Castor JDO. So I agree with you about the LockEngine, but
> only for the refactored version. We decide what is the core, and
> anything outside of the core becomes a module. Why don't we move
> this discussion into the thread regarding the direction of the
> refactored Castor JDO.

- -- 

Virtually, 
Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

D08C2F45:  28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51  3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net

iD8DBQE80WmPiysnOdCML0URAg1xAJ9rz6zQ4jvBQj8tFgrvibJpOORR5ACfZS2Y
7doCXuYJqYo3LEZsfHeIrBA=
=NbuN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-dev

Reply via email to