-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Alright, alright... I'll skip the pluggable lock engine. If I'm the only one who wants it, then it doesn't make sense. I'm still going to work on the object removal from the cache, and make sure the lock engine is involved in that process. (Just remember folks, its not hard to make the Lock Engine pluggable... just create a factory that returns a LockEngine implementation, and read the name of the implementation from the properties file) > From: "Walters, Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:43:48 -0400 > > I would definitely go for adequate performance (master/detail without n+1 > queries) before distributed cache or pluggable lock engine if I have any > vote. - -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net iD8DBQE80IT5iysnOdCML0URAjdsAJ9uFWPfBxEHsPzPM6Rpx4aRydPFGgCfSLbI q8s/nbxjoqTjHEbKsvO8oac= =agoA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
