I always thought there was truth to the racer cruiser thing until I went
racing for a number of years and then I learned "hand" was a slippery slope.
Before doing my tenure racing my cruiser had some elegant diameter lines but
then I began to learn lessons about crew fatigue in 24 hour plus races.

 

The stretch of a line factors directly into keeping the sails in trim under
variable winds. Stretchy line means bigger knock downs in a gust and having
to trim sails frequently. Conclusion stretchy line leads to more crew
fatigue. So what was considered good for "hand" was bad for the crew. That
for most of us will take us to Sta-set X as a good price point solution for
low stretch. 

 

The other "hand" myth I was bought into was bigger diameter was easier to
grip and better on your hands. What I learned is how much force is required
to bend a line around a sheave under load is directly related to the line's
diameter. Increase the line size and the actual force to do the job can
increase dramatically. This is especially true if you exceed the blocks line
size. Besides the obvious rubbing on the sides that could occur it takes
more force to bend the line bulging over the side of the sheave like a flat
tire. So I learned to buy the diameter specified by the factory (in this
case 5/16") and save the crew.

 

Add the last "hand" related lesson I learned if I replaced the plain sheaves
with ball bearing sheaves lines ran so free I could easily raise the main to
full hoist without a winch. This is not important, except to note it was a
lot less work.

 

I guess that was the next to the last. The last was spinnaker sheet line
diameter and line type. Initially I did not listen to my sail maker and did
it the "hand" way which resulted in me concluding it was a terrible sail.
Two years later I rethought my selection for sheets and it magically became
a wonderful sail capable of light air performance that caused a series jaw
drops one evening as I sailed past a group of boats waiting for the evening
breeze to fill.

 

When converting to a continuous 5/16" halyard from a spliced wire-line
halyard the mast head sheaves should really be inspected and most likely
changed from a wire style to line sheave. Typically the wire sheave has a V
groove and the line sheave has a U groove.

 

"Hand" is still a factor and some racers will rig a boat with Kevlar twine
to when races but Catalina Yachts isn't one of those so stay with the
factory recommendations.

 

Phil Agur
<http://www.catalina27.org/public_pages/profile270.htm> s/v Wing Tip
Secretary,                    Call Sign WCW3485
IC27/270A                   MMSI 366901790 
www.catalina27.org     Vessel Doc# 1039809

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sneddon, Keith
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: catalina27-talk: Main halyard replacement

 

I think this may be one of those "racer vs. cruiser" things. The Sta-Set

is not as stiff, true, but 3/8 Sta-set has better "hand" and better wear

resistance than 5/16 Sta-Set x, T-900, etc. On my boat, I still have

only 2 external halyards. I had a local rigger make me up a spliced

wire/Sta-Set 3/8 main Halyard. My original mast head sheaves were in

good shape, so I left them. When the main is up, I have wire down to

just above the turning block on the deck, then Sta-Set for the remainder

through the deck organizer and the Cam-Block on the cabin top, just

forward of the winch(maybe 8-10 ft of Sta-Set under tension). The

downside of wire halyards is that you can't use the fancy-shmancy roller

bearing sheaves at the masthead, as the steel wire will eat through the

anodized aluminum sheave in no time flat. My solution was the cheapest

option I looked at, will last a long time, and gives me reasonable

overall halyard stretch control. For my Jib halyard, I have a CDI furler

with an internal halyard, so the Jib Halyard is there primarily as a

spare, or if I (God Forbid) have to haul somebody in on the Lifesling,

so stretch is not much of a consideration. If I get to the point where I

am competitively racing this boat, I will go internal exotic all rope

halyards (4x), lose the CDI, get the nice sheaves, etc.

 

Keith Sneddon

 

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tim ford

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:53 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: Main halyard replacement

 

Agree. 5/16th is the way to go and you'll get much better performance

with Sta-Set-X then with Sta-Set,

as it has much higher stretch resistance....Sta-Set is like

bungy-cord...Sta-Set X is almost as good as T-900

(well, not really but it's so much cheaper)

 

tf

 

 

 

 

Mark Tamblyn wrote:

>

> I think you will be happier with 5/16 I'm pretty sure that is what I

used.

>

 

 

 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the
sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT
Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for
the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by
any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

Reply via email to