Yay! Thanks, t0m! t0m's fix looks like it will work for me, but I'm not sure what it will do for Felix. I was afraid any change would break someone. If Felix's scripts work because they're run from the CWD or has the lib in @INC, then he'll be fine. Not sure how they'd work otherwise.
On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Dimitar Petrov wrote: > I think the latest commit actually fixes that issue (thanks to t0m). You can > check out here: > https://github.com/rafl/catalyst-runtime/commit/a8946dc8b4ba4c46b4db564b8f9692d48cc7a62f > > Cheers > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Felix Ostmann <ostm...@websuche.de> wrote: > Plz dont change to $FindBin::RealBin/.. ! That will break our projects (we > use script/http/catayst_fastcgi_server.pl). > > > 2012/2/29 Louis Erickson <lerick...@rdwarf.net> > > On Feb 22, 2012, at 10:57 PM, Dami Laurent (PJ) wrote: > > >> -----Message d'origine----- > >> De : Kieren Diment [mailto:dim...@gmail.com] > > [...] > >> My understanding was that a recent release of catalyst had a bug that > >> meant that the scripts couldn't infer the location of the app's lib > >> directory. It seems to be fixed in version 5.90010 as per this changes > >> file: > >> > >> https://metacpan.org/source/MSTROUT/Catalyst-Runtime-5.90010/Changes > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > Well, I just installed, 5.900010, the bug is still there. > > There is a RT ticket, still open : > > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=75098 > > The issue I noticed in 5.9.0010 is still true; it only adds the libraries to > @INC if the current working directory contains the Makefile.PL. It's trying > to guess if this is checked out from source control, and guessing oddly. > > What I don't understand is why it guesses that CWD is the place to check; > wouldn't $FindBin::RealBin/.. be a better choice and less likely to be an > error? CWD is a pretty external thing and can change easily. > > This little change messes up a bunch of tools I use, and means that the > fastcgi version won't start in my webserver without a config change there. > > If I can ever get free time to poke it, I may offer a patch which adds a > check for both CWD and a path relative to the script. Doing that neatly has > been more time than I have had in the last week. It's on my list, really. > > Who would be the right person to send such a patch to? The list in general? > > > _______________________________________________ > List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
