Does anybody have any facts on this or are we just guessing ? Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 22, 2012, at 4:03 PM, "Jay McMickle" <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe Marko blogged about it in Feb. have you searched the archives? > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP > Sent from iJay > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy >> is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give >> "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime >>> soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training >>> materials and do not want to buy old gear. >>> >>> BR >>> >>> Tony >>> CCNP CCNA R&S >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>> >>> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>>> >>>> >>>> Today's Topics: >>>> >>>> 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) >>>> 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) >>>> 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) >>>> 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) >>>> 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) >>>> 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) >>>> 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 >>>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, ccie >>>> onlyone <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>> >>>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>>> >>>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >>>> brevity. :: >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, Marko >>>>> shuts it down, and offline emails me. >>>>> >>>>> BUT >>>>> >>>>> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay closer watch an >>>>> help us filter these guys out. ;) >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note >>>>> from IPX. >>>>> >>>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >>>>> Sent from iJay >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> ccietocome >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 2 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 >>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>> per a specific router.. >>>> >>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>> >>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>> >>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something here? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 3 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) >>>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> >>>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hello,? >>>> >>>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. ?Im >>>> 21 and on a budget. >>>> >>>> Thanks.? >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 4 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 >>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 5 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, >>>> [email protected], [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >>>> >>>> Hi Khaled, >>>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 >>>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your >>>> respective loopbacks? >>>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> Sender: [email protected] >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 6 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 >>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: >>>>> Hi fellas, >>>>> >>>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>>> >>>>> R2 ------> hub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>>> >>>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R1# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R5# >>>>> >>>>> here is my output from R2: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 7 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 >>>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> >>>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>>> >>>> Hello Joe, >>>> >>>> I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said that do not >>>> change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean >>>> that he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . >>>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Elie Raad >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich >>>> [[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> >>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>> per a specific router.. >>>> >>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>> >>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>> >>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something here? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >>>> *************************************** >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
