I sent out Marko's blog shortly after the email below. Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from iJay
On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:06 PM, "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anybody have any facts on this or are we just guessing ? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 4:03 PM, "Jay McMickle" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I believe Marko blogged about it in Feb. have you searched the archives? >> >> Regards, >> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >> Sent from iJay >> >> On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy >>> is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give >>> "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys >>>> >>>> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime >>>> soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training >>>> materials and do not want to buy old gear. >>>> >>>> BR >>>> >>>> Tony >>>> CCNP CCNA R&S >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>>> >>>> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Today's Topics: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) >>>>> 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) >>>>> 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) >>>>> 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) >>>>> 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) >>>>> 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) >>>>> 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Message: 1 >>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 >>>>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>>>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, ccie >>>>> onlyone <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>>> >>>>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>>>> >>>>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >>>>> brevity. :: >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, >>>>>> Marko shuts it down, and offline emails me. >>>>>> >>>>>> BUT >>>>>> >>>>>> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay closer watch >>>>>> an help us filter these guys out. ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note >>>>>> from IPX. >>>>>> >>>>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >>>>>> Sent from iJay >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>> ccietocome >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 2 >>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 >>>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>>> >>>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>>> per a specific router.. >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>>> >>>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>>> >>>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something here? >>>>> >>>>> V/R >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 3 >>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) >>>>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> >>>>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >>>>> >>>>> Hello,? >>>>> >>>>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. >>>>> ?Im 21 and on a budget. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks.? >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 4 >>>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 >>>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>>> >>>>> Hi fellas, >>>>> >>>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>>> >>>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>>> >>>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R1# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R5# >>>>> >>>>> here is my output from R2: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 5 >>>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, >>>>> [email protected], [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> >>>>> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >>>>> >>>>> Hi Khaled, >>>>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 >>>>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your >>>>> respective loopbacks? >>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>>> Sender: [email protected] >>>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>>> >>>>> Hi fellas, >>>>> >>>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>>> >>>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>>> >>>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R1# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R5# >>>>> >>>>> here is my output from R2: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 6 >>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 >>>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>>> >>>>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? >>>>> >>>>> V/R >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: >>>>>> Hi fellas, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not >>>>>> up >>>>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>>>> >>>>>> R2 ------> hub >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>>>> ! >>>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>>> no auto-summary >>>>>> no synchronization >>>>>> exit-address-family >>>>>> ! >>>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>>> no auto-summary >>>>>> no synchronization >>>>>> exit-address-family >>>>>> R2# >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>>>> >>>>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>>> ! >>>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>>> no auto-summary >>>>>> no synchronization >>>>>> exit-address-family >>>>>> ! >>>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>>> no auto-summary >>>>>> no synchronization >>>>>> exit-address-family >>>>>> R1# >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>>> ! >>>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>>> no auto-summary >>>>>> no synchronization >>>>>> exit-address-family >>>>>> ! >>>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>>> no auto-summary >>>>>> no synchronization >>>>>> exit-address-family >>>>>> R5# >>>>>> >>>>>> here is my output from R2: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>>> Active >>>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>>> Active >>>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>>> Active >>>>>> R2# >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 7 >>>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 >>>>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> >>>>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> >>>>> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>>>> >>>>> Hello Joe, >>>>> >>>>> I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said that do not >>>>> change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean >>>>> that he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Elie Raad >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich >>>>> [[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>>> >>>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>>> per a specific router.. >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>>> >>>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>>> >>>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something here? >>>>> >>>>> V/R >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >>>>> *************************************** >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
