Here it is again- I googled it and found the link. It's from last Oct., but it was Marko. http://blog.ipexpert.com/2011/10/11/will-there-be-a-blueprint-change/
Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from iJay On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Joe Danrich <[email protected]> wrote: > There was some email traffic that was just rolled up in the weekly list, > however I can't find the original email... > > Does anyone actually know? > > On Apr 22, 2012 1:03 PM, "Jay McMickle" <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe Marko blogged about it in Feb. have you searched the archives? > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP > Sent from iJay > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy > > is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give > > "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi guys > >> > >> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime > >> soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training > >> materials and do not want to buy old gear. > >> > >> BR > >> > >> Tony > >> CCNP CCNA R&S > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone on 3 > >> > >> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> You can reach the person managing the list at > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > >>> > >>> > >>> Today's Topics: > >>> > >>> 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) > >>> 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) > >>> 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) > >>> 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) > >>> 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) > >>> 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) > >>> 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> Message: 1 > >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 > >>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > >>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, ccie > >>> onlyone <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 > >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >>> > >>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > >>> > >>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and > >>> brevity. :: > >>> > >>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, > >>>> Marko shuts it down, and offline emails me. > >>>> > >>>> BUT > >>>> > >>>> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay closer watch > >>>> an help us filter these guys out. ;) > >>>> > >>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note > >>>> from IPX. > >>>> > >>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP > >>>> Sent from iJay > >>>> > >>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me > >>>>> > >>>>> regards, > >>>>> ccietocome > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >>>>> > >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>>>> > >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >>>> > >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>>> > >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Message: 2 > >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 > >>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> > >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 > >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >>> > >>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one > >>> per a specific router.. > >>> > >>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each > >>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. > >>> > >>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state > >>> that each router should import the others route-target? > >>> > >>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do > >>> something, you shouldn't do it.. > >>> > >>> Am I missing something here? > >>> > >>> V/R > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Message: 3 > >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) > >>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> > >>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs > >>> Message-ID: > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >>> > >>> Hello,? > >>> > >>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. > >>> ?Im 21 and on a budget. > >>> > >>> Thanks.? > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Message: 4 > >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 > >>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > >>> Message-ID: > >>> <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >>> > >>> Hi fellas, > >>> > >>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up > >>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration > >>> > >>> R2 ------ > hub > >>> > >>> > >>> R2#sr | s bgp > >>> router bgp 1 > >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>> neighbor peergroup peer-group > >>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 > >>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 > >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> R2# > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R1 ----------> spoke > >>> > >>> R1#sr | s bg > >>> router bgp 1 > >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> R1# > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R5 --------> Spoke > >>> > >>> > >>> R5#sr | s bg > >>> router bgp 1 > >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> R5# > >>> > >>> here is my output from R2: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum > >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > >>> State/PfxRcd > >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > >>> Active ---------------> it is > >>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 > >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum > >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > >>> State/PfxRcd > >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > >>> R2# > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Message: 5 > >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 > >>> From: [email protected] > >>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, > >>> [email protected], [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > >>> Message-ID: > >>> > >>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> > >>> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" > >>> > >>> Hi Khaled, > >>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 > >>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your > >>> respective loopbacks? > >>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> > >>> Sender: [email protected] > >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 > >>> To: <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > >>> > >>> Hi fellas, > >>> > >>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up > >>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration > >>> > >>> R2 ------ > hub > >>> > >>> > >>> R2#sr | s bgp > >>> router bgp 1 > >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>> neighbor peergroup peer-group > >>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 > >>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 > >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> R2# > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R1 ----------> spoke > >>> > >>> R1#sr | s bg > >>> router bgp 1 > >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> R1# > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R5 --------> Spoke > >>> > >>> > >>> R5#sr | s bg > >>> router bgp 1 > >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> ! > >>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>> no auto-summary > >>> no synchronization > >>> exit-address-family > >>> R5# > >>> > >>> here is my output from R2: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum > >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > >>> State/PfxRcd > >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > >>> Active ---------------> it is > >>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 > >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum > >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > >>> State/PfxRcd > >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > >>> R2# > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Message: 6 > >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 > >>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> > >>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >>> > >>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? > >>> > >>> V/R > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: > >>>> Hi fellas, > >>>> > >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not > >>>> up > >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration > >>>> > >>>> R2 ------> hub > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> R2#sr | s bgp > >>>> router bgp 1 > >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group > >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 > >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup > >>>> ! > >>>> address-family ipv4 > >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > >>>> no auto-summary > >>>> no synchronization > >>>> exit-address-family > >>>> ! > >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > >>>> no auto-summary > >>>> no synchronization > >>>> exit-address-family > >>>> R2# > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> R1 ----------> spoke > >>>> > >>>> R1#sr | s bg > >>>> router bgp 1 > >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > >>>> ! > >>>> address-family ipv4 > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>>> no auto-summary > >>>> no synchronization > >>>> exit-address-family > >>>> ! > >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>>> no auto-summary > >>>> no synchronization > >>>> exit-address-family > >>>> R1# > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> R5 --------> Spoke > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> R5#sr | s bg > >>>> router bgp 1 > >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast > >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > >>>> ! > >>>> address-family ipv4 > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>>> no auto-summary > >>>> no synchronization > >>>> exit-address-family > >>>> ! > >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast > >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > >>>> no auto-summary > >>>> no synchronization > >>>> exit-address-family > >>>> R5# > >>>> > >>>> here is my output from R2: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum > >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > >>>> State/PfxRcd > >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > >>>> Active ---------------> it is > >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 > >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > >>>> Active > >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum > >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > >>>> State/PfxRcd > >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > >>>> Active > >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > >>>> Active > >>>> R2# > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >>>> > >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>>> > >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Message: 7 > >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 > >>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> > >>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 > >>> Message-ID: > >>> > >>> <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> > >>> > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >>> > >>> Hello Joe, > >>> > >>> I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said that do not > >>> change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean > >>> that he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . > >>> > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> > >>> Elie Raad > >>> > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> From: [email protected] > >>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich > >>> [[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 > >>> > >>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one > >>> per a specific router.. > >>> > >>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each > >>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. > >>> > >>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state > >>> that each router should import the others route-target? > >>> > >>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do > >>> something, you shouldn't do it.. > >>> > >>> Am I missing something here? > >>> > >>> V/R > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 > >>> *************************************** > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
