There was some email traffic that was just rolled up in the weekly
list, however I can't find the original email...
Does anyone actually know?
On Apr 22, 2012 1:03 PM, "Jay McMickle" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I believe Marko blogged about it in Feb. have you searched the
archives?
Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
Sent from iJay
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's
policy
> is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give
> "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5
anytime soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying
equipment and training materials and do not want to buy old gear.
>>
>> BR
>>
>> Tony
>> CCNP CCNA R&S
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone on 3
>>
>> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic)
>>> 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich)
>>> 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers)
>>> 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman)
>>> 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>)
>>> 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich)
>>> 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad)
>>>
>>>
>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700
>>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Cc: "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, ccie
>>> onlyone <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5
>>> Message-ID:
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>
>>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7
last week.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>>
>>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize
for errors and brevity. ::
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest
opinion, Marko shuts it down, and offline emails me.
>>>>
>>>> BUT
>>>>
>>>> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay
closer watch an help us filter these guys out. ;)
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a
nasty note from IPX.
>>>>
>>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
>>>> Sent from iJay
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> ccietocome
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>>>
>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>>>
>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700
>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> To: "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>>
>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA &
VPNB) one
>>> per a specific router..
>>>
>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each
>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and
vice versa.
>>>
>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions
guide, state
>>> that each router should import the others route-target?
>>>
>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell
you to do
>>> something, you shouldn't do it..
>>>
>>> Am I missing something here?
>>>
>>> V/R
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
>>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>>>
>>> Hello,?
>>>
>>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that
are free. ?Im 21 and on a budget.
>>>
>>> Thanks.?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300
>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a
>>> Message-ID:
>>>
<CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5%[email protected]>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>
>>> Hi fellas,
>>>
>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp
connection is not up
>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my
configuration
>>>
>>> R2 ------ > hub
>>>
>>>
>>> R2#sr | s bgp
>>> router bgp 1
>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group
>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1
>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4
>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client
>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client
>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> R2#
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R1 ----------> spoke
>>>
>>> R1#sr | s bg
>>> router bgp 1
>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> R1#
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R5 --------> Spoke
>>>
>>>
>>> R5#sr | s bg
>>> router bgp 1
>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> R5#
>>>
>>> here is my output from R2:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum
>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1
>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>>> State/PfxRcd
>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never
>>> Active
---------------> it is
>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5
>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum
>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1
>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>>> State/PfxRcd
>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>> R2#
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 5
>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000
>>> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>,
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a
>>> Message-ID:
>>>
<1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry
<mailto:1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry>>
>>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>>>
>>> Hi Khaled,
>>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer
3 reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings
from your respective loopbacks?
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Sender: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33
>>> To: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a
>>>
>>> Hi fellas,
>>>
>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp
connection is not up
>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my
configuration
>>>
>>> R2 ------ > hub
>>>
>>>
>>> R2#sr | s bgp
>>> router bgp 1
>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group
>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1
>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4
>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client
>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client
>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> R2#
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R1 ----------> spoke
>>>
>>> R1#sr | s bg
>>> router bgp 1
>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> R1#
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R5 --------> Spoke
>>>
>>>
>>> R5#sr | s bg
>>> router bgp 1
>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> !
>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>> no auto-summary
>>> no synchronization
>>> exit-address-family
>>> R5#
>>>
>>> here is my output from R2:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum
>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1
>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>>> State/PfxRcd
>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never
>>> Active
---------------> it is
>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5
>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum
>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1
>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>>> State/PfxRcd
>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>> R2#
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>>
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 6
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700
>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>>
>>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the
relevant peer?
>>>
>>> V/R
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote:
>>>> Hi fellas,
>>>>
>>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp
connection is not up
>>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my
configuration
>>>>
>>>> R2 ------> hub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R2#sr | s bgp
>>>> router bgp 1
>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group
>>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1
>>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup
>>>> !
>>>> address-family ipv4
>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client
>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> exit-address-family
>>>> !
>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client
>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> exit-address-family
>>>> R2#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R1 ----------> spoke
>>>>
>>>> R1#sr | s bg
>>>> router bgp 1
>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0
>>>> !
>>>> address-family ipv4
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> exit-address-family
>>>> !
>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> exit-address-family
>>>> R1#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R5 --------> Spoke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R5#sr | s bg
>>>> router bgp 1
>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0
>>>> !
>>>> address-family ipv4
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> exit-address-family
>>>> !
>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast
>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> exit-address-family
>>>> R5#
>>>>
>>>> here is my output from R2:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum
>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1
>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>>>> State/PfxRcd
>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never
>>>> Active
---------------> it is
>>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5
>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum
>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1
>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>>>> State/PfxRcd
>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
never Active
>>>> R2#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>>>
>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>>>
>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 7
>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000
>>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>"
>>> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6
>>> Message-ID:
>>>
<3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
<mailto:3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>>
>>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> Hello Joe,
>>>
>>> I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said
that do not change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2
and R8. which mean that he want us to exchange routes coming from
R2 and R8 .
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Elie Raad
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of Joe
Danrich [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6
>>>
>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA &
VPNB) one
>>> per a specific router..
>>>
>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each
>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and
vice versa.
>>>
>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions
guide, state
>>> that each router should import the others route-target?
>>>
>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell
you to do
>>> something, you shouldn't do it..
>>>
>>> Am I missing something here?
>>>
>>> V/R
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>>
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36
>>> ***************************************
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
