Would those matches be something similar to a "match-all" - as in both have to be matched or its more of a "match-any"
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Kingsley Charles < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > We use "match mac" for matching non-IP traffic with VACLs. And when we have > more than one match entries, they should ANDed. Said with this, what would > be circumstances where we would use > the following type of VACL access map that has a match entry for IP and > MAC. > > vlan access-map king > action forward > match mac address macking > match ip address 123 > > Why would Cisco give this option? > > Any thoughts? > > With regards > Kings > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
