Logically, when there are two entries in different rows they should ANDed and if it is in the same row as following, then it's ORed. Same applies to route-maps too.
match ip address 123 132 With regards Kings On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Mark Senteza <[email protected]>wrote: > Would those matches be something similar to a "match-all" - as in both have > to be matched or its more of a "match-any" > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Kingsley Charles < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> We use "match mac" for matching non-IP traffic with VACLs. And when we >> have more than one match entries, they should ANDed. Said with this, what >> would be circumstances where we would use >> the following type of VACL access map that has a match entry for IP and >> MAC. >> >> vlan access-map king >> action forward >> match mac address macking >> match ip address 123 >> >> Why would Cisco give this option? >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> With regards >> Kings >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
