Although I've not checked that I think it does not work as you described.

Snipped from doc:
When a flow matches a permit ACL entry, the associated action is taken and
the flow is not checked against the remaining sequences. When a flow matches
a deny ACL entry, it will be checked against the next ACL in the same
sequence or the next sequence. If a flow does not match any ACL entry and at
least one ACL is configured for that packet type, the packet is denied.

Regards,
Piotr


2011/9/8 Kingsley Charles <[email protected]>

> It should be AND operation between entries that are in two different lines
> and OR operatio, if the entries are on the same line.
>
> Thus in your example, the access-list IP and ARP_Packet should be ANDed.
>
> With regards
> Kings
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Andrey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, sure and I thought I answered you there:
>> "forbid arp resolution for block adresses..."
>> and in my example needed to add this:
>>
>> ip access-list ext IP
>> permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
>> !
>> match ip address IP
>>
>> and we get this:
>>
>> LABSW1#sh vlan access-map block_arp
>> Vlan access-map "block_arp"  10
>>   Match clauses:
>>     ip  address: IP
>>     mac address: ARP_Packet
>>   Action:
>>     drop
>> Vlan access-map "block_arp"  20
>>   Match clauses:
>>   Action:
>>     forward
>>
>> LABSW1#sh access-l
>> Extended IP access list IP
>>     10 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
>> Extended MAC access list ARP_Packet
>>     permit any any 0x806 0x0
>>
>> BUT I guess that my answer is almost useless because, logic inside entry
>> "vlan access-map "block_arp"  10" will be OR and not AND.
>> Thus there is one answer - Cisco gave us this option for certain
>> facilities that we would not have to add extra lines config
>> "vlan access-map <MAP> <NUMBER>" and "action drop" if we have to match by
>> ethertype and address+port at the same time.
>> Sorry, I see no other explanation.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Kingsley Charles <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually I wanted to know the use case of having mac and ip acl as
>>> matching criteria in the same VACL entry.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Andrey
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to