Yes but the CLI accepts. Just try and that's why I have asked are there cases for this type of VACL?
With regards Kings On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Peter Debye <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > by definition, a VACL entry matching on mac access-list is applicable to > non-IP > traffic only; hence the example that you give is probably a typo, and those > two lines should be under separate entries on the VACL: > > vlan access-map king 10 > action forward > match mac address <macacl> > vlan access-map king 20 > action forward > match ip address 123 > > p. > ================================================ > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Kingsley Charles < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > We use "match mac" for matching non-IP traffic with VACLs. And when we > > have more than one match entries, they should ANDed. Said with this, > > what would be circumstances where we would use the following type of > > VACL access map that has a match entry for IP and MAC. > > > > vlan access-map king > > action forward > > match mac address macking > > match ip address 123 > > > > Why would Cisco give this option? > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > With regards > > Kings > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
