It should work without shaping though. Lets take a look..

class-m match-any RTP
match ip dscp ef

class-m match-any SIG
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31

policy-map LLQ-BR1
class RTP
band per 33
class SIG
band per 10
class class-default
map-class frame NOFRTS-BR1
service out LLQ-BR1

int s0/0/0:0.1
band 768
frame class NOFRTS-BR1
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting point.  I'll have to set it up and try it.  But it might very
> possibly be done without shaping on a
> dedicated point to point circuit (not frame relay).  I don't see the two as
> being nailed to each other.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Hennrich" <[email protected]>
> To: "Kumar, Narinder" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Cliff McGlamry" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]
> >
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
>
>
> I think shaping should be in place in very case, only lfi or
> fragmentation is only needed, when used by low speed links.
>
> as far as i know, the LLQ policy map will not work without shaping applied.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong
>
> HTH
>
> Kumar, Narinder schrieb:
> > What if it says that the BW between sites is 768Kbps. Do you think that's
> > the hint. Thanks Narinder
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, 16 March 2009 6:05 PM
> > To: Kumar, Narinder; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
> >
> > Re-read, see if it hints at it, if there is a question, ask the proctor.
> > In
> > the end, do what it tells you to.
> >
> > If you were going to provide shaping, you'd have to have some values to
> > shape TO.  So unless those are provided, you're just throwing numbers in
> > there.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kumar, Narinder" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
> >
> >
> > All,
> > If the  question is
> > Between HQ and BR2 configure LFI ( using FRF.12 or MLP) and LLQ.
> >
> > Would you still provide shaping or not.
> >
> > I guess I am trying to find out from the real lab point of view if the
> > question doesn't state anything about FR shaping is it a good idea to do
> > FR
> > traffic shaping or leave it alone as it is not asked in the question
> >
> > Any view ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Narinder
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail
> > message
> > is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are
> > not
> > an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics
> Australia
> > immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your
> > computer.  Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part
> > thereof, is strictly prohibited.
> > DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and
> > opinions
> > expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics
> > Australia.
> > While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses,
> Getronics
> > Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free of
> > viruses or any other defects or errors.  It is the duty of the recipient
> > to
> > virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email
> > before
> > loading onto any computer system.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail
> > message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If
> > you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact
> > Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this
> > message from your computer.  Any unauthorised form of reproduction of
> this
> > message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited.
> > DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and
> > opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> Getronics
> > Australia.  While we endeavour to protect our network from computer
> > viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any
> > attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors.  It is
> the
> > duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information
> > contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>

Reply via email to