You are right.
I had mincir, cir and so on configured, but the frame-relay
traffic-shaping command forgotten, so that the policy-map could not work.
Thank you all, for getting one thing more clear!
Wesley Lim schrieb:
It should work without shaping though. Lets take a look..
class-m match-any RTP
match ip dscp ef
class-m match-any SIG
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31
policy-map LLQ-BR1
class RTP
band per 33
class SIG
band per 10
class class-default
map-class frame NOFRTS-BR1
service out LLQ-BR1
int s0/0/0:0.1
band 768
frame class NOFRTS-BR1
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Interesting point. I'll have to set it up and try it. But it might
very
possibly be done without shaping on a
dedicated point to point circuit (not frame relay). I don't see the
two as
being nailed to each other.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Hennrich" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "Kumar, Narinder" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Cliff McGlamry" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
I think shaping should be in place in very case, only lfi or
fragmentation is only needed, when used by low speed links.
as far as i know, the LLQ policy map will not work without shaping
applied.
Correct me if I'm wrong
HTH
Kumar, Narinder schrieb:
> What if it says that the BW between sites is 768Kbps. Do you
think that's
> the hint. Thanks Narinder
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Monday, 16 March 2009 6:05 PM
> To: Kumar, Narinder; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
>
> Re-read, see if it hints at it, if there is a question, ask the
proctor.
> In
> the end, do what it tells you to.
>
> If you were going to provide shaping, you'd have to have some
values to
> shape TO. So unless those are provided, you're just throwing
numbers in
> there.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kumar, Narinder" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> To: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
>
>
> All,
> If the question is
> Between HQ and BR2 configure LFI ( using FRF.12 or MLP) and LLQ.
>
> Would you still provide shaping or not.
>
> I guess I am trying to find out from the real lab point of view
if the
> question doesn't state anything about FR shaping is it a good
idea to do
> FR
> traffic shaping or leave it alone as it is not asked in the question
>
> Any view ?
>
> Thanks
> Narinder
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail
> message
> is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If
you are
> not
> an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics
Australia
> immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your
> computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message,
or part
> thereof, is strictly prohibited.
> DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and
> opinions
> expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics
> Australia.
> While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses,
Getronics
> Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are
free of
> viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the
recipient
> to
> virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email
> before
> loading onto any computer system.
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail
> message is confidential and is intended solely for the
addressee(s). If
> you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact
> Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete
this
> message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of
reproduction of this
> message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited.
> DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and
> opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
Getronics
> Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer
> viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any
> attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors.
It is the
> duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any
information
> contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>
______________________________________________________________________
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
