*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:18, Phil Evans wrote:
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Anastassis Perrakis (NKI) writes:
Have you looked at the whole Wilson plot in general, if it has the
right peaks and valleys etc etc ?
You can do that with ccp4/Wilson and its also done by default when you
run ARP/wARP, the latter
having the advantage of seeing the expected shape as established in
the
'BEST' work of Popov et al.
I would comment that I have yet to find any dataset, including some
truly excellent ones, which pass the arp/warp Wilson plot test.
Has anyone else found a dataset that is OK according to this test?
I have seen one that passed the criteria ! ;-)
That is to say that the quality criteria are indeed too strict and will
be relaxed in the new release.
(a good thing is that it forces you to look at the Wilson plot, but its
indeed annoying...).
I admit in most cases I decide to 'Continue' ... ' with bad data'
unless the low resolution
or high resolution are really really very bad - visually. I don't like
personally the 'Limit Resolution' button.
Victor and Sasha might not agree with me though.
But, 'overly cautious' is a fare characterization, although Phil might
argue its a bit mild !
Tassos
Phil
