Free flow electrophoresis would be another option, by the way anybody on the 
East Coast who has one of those instruments ? I'd be interested to get an email 
directly.

Thanks,

Jürgen

On Sep 5, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:

mea culpa! How about FRET?

JPK

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Bosch, Juergen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Jacob,
you forgot cross-linking to stabilize a weak complex and verify that it
exists.
Jürgen
On Sep 5, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:

Well, I guess I have always been curious what is the gold standard
here--perhaps SEC, ITC, SPR, pulldowns? What if SEC shows a
polydisperse sample with weak oligomerization, or SPR a very weak
binding constant? Do we then revert to a functional assay? Or what if
the functional assay does not show anything, but the binding constant
is really strong? Or vice versa, the binding is completely
undetectable, but the functional assay shows something?

JPK

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Phil Evans 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I get confused by these figures. As I understand it the "interface area"
given in Pisa is half the loss of accessible area on forming the complex: is
that right?

We're working on a complex with interface area ~500A^2, where the complex is
stable enough for gel filtration, and with a measured Kd of ~2microM, Pisa
estimate of DelG -2.3. Does that sound sensible?

Phil

On 5 Sep 2011, at 10:33, Eugene Krissinel wrote:

720 is not an impressive size for a stable interface, but it may do
depending on molecule size and exact chemistry of the interface (h-bonds,
salt bridges, disulphides, charges etc etc). Everything is subject to
chemical environment and concentration, as usual. For these entries, PISA
gives dissociation free energy of -1 kcal/mol. Given some +/- 5 kcal/mol
estimated (guessed) accuracy of PISA, this may or may not be a stable thing.
And yes, it has about 70-80% chances to be simply an artefact of crystal
packing, according to some sort of derivations that I did in 2nd PISA paper
in J.Comp.Chem. in January last year.

Having said all this, PISA is not an oracle and does not pretend to be
correct in 100% of instances.

Eugene.


On 5 Sep 2011, at 10:14, Eleanor Dodson wrote:

Like Jan, I find it very useful to sort out the clear cut cases. Otherwise
it is easy to get things wrong..

But isnt a buried surface area of 720 rather small for a stable interface?
 If there is other confirming evidence like 2 diff space groups then you
feel more secure!!

On 09/01/2011 02:27 PM, Yuri Pompeu wrote:

This is regarding Ethan´s point, particularly:

2) the protein has crystallized as a monomer even though it

[sometimes] exists in solution as a dimer.  The interface

seen in the crystal is not the "real" dimer interface and

thus the PISA score is correct.

I see the same exact interface in a crystal of a close homologue that
belongs to a different space group (hexagonal vs tetragonal system)




--
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
*******************************************

......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:      +1-410-614-4894
Fax:      +1-410-955-2926
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/








--
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
*******************************************

......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:      +1-410-614-4894
Fax:      +1-410-955-2926
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/





Reply via email to