I did a similar assay years ago, but since the results were negative,
never published anything--it was seeing whether nucleotides bound to
my protein of interest by time courses of proteolysis +/- nucleotide.
One tricky part of the assay, however, is to be sure that the compound
of interest doesn't inhibit the protease--did you address that? I
guess you would have to have some control proteins for that...

Jacob


g
>
> --
> Jing Huang, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> UCLA
> Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology
> 310-825-4329
> jinghuang at mednet dot ucla dot edu
> http://labs.pharmacology.ucla.edu/huanglab/
>
> ________________________________________
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jacob Keller 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 10:10 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Trying to "digest" PISA results
>
> NMR...take that!
>
> JPK
>
> 2011/9/5 Andreas Förster <[email protected]>:
>> AUC !
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/09/2011 6:00, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>>
>>> mea culpa! How about FRET?
>>>
>>> JPK
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Bosch, Juergen<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jacob,
>>>> you forgot cross-linking to stabilize a weak complex and verify that it
>>>> exists.
>>>> Jürgen
>>>> On Sep 5, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, I guess I have always been curious what is the gold standard
>>>> here--perhaps SEC, ITC, SPR, pulldowns? What if SEC shows a
>>>> polydisperse sample with weak oligomerization, or SPR a very weak
>>>> binding constant? Do we then revert to a functional assay? Or what if
>>>> the functional assay does not show anything, but the binding constant
>>>> is really strong? Or vice versa, the binding is completely
>>>> undetectable, but the functional assay shows something?
>>>>
>>>> JPK
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>        Andreas Förster, Research Associate
>>        Paul Freemont & Xiaodong Zhang Labs
>> Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College London
>>            http://www.msf.bio.ic.ac.uk
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *******************************************
> Jacob Pearson Keller
> Northwestern University
> Medical Scientist Training Program
> cel: 773.608.9185
> email: [email protected]
> *******************************************
>
> IMPORTANT WARNING:  This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the 
> use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain 
> information that is privileged and confidential.  You, the recipient, are 
> obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner.  
> Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject 
> you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from 
> your computer.
>



-- 
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: [email protected]
*******************************************

Reply via email to