Just search for genetic code evolution in pubmed and you will find tons of
literature on it. The main driving force appears to have been to minimize
physico-chemical changes in amino acid properties for frequent mutations.
In other words, if you take mutation rates at the single-nucleotide level
and use it to predict, via a codon table, the rates of amino acid mutations
you will find that it correlates strongly with the observed amino acid
rates.

Bart

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Jacob Keller <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Never one to shrink from philosophizing, I wonder generally why the codon
> conventions are the way they are? Is it like the QWERTY keyboard--basically
> an historical accident--or is there some more beautiful reason? One might
> argue that since basically all organisms share the convention (are there
> exceptions, even?), that it must be the "best of all possible" conventions.
> I have often wondered whether maybe this particular convention allows for
> the most effective pathways between proteins of significant function, e.g.,
> through the fewest mutations perhaps? One certainly cannot maintain that
> every possible protein sequence has been made at some time or another in
> the history of the biological world (go quantitate!) so there must be a way
> to ensure that mostly the "best" ones got made. On the other hand, since
> many organisms share DNA, maybe they had to "agree" on a system (I think
> this is the dogma?). Was there a "United Organisms" convention at some
> point, reminiscent of "Les Immortels" of the French language or POSIX or
> something, to ensure compliance? What was the penalty for non-compliance?
>
> Anyway, I like the question about the methionines,
>
> Jacob
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Edward A. Berry <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Opher Gileadi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Theresa,
>>>
>>> To add to Anat's comments: Although the AUG codon for the first
>>> methionine and all other methionines in a protein coding sequence look the
>>> same, they are read in a very different way by the ribosomal machinery. The
>>> first AUG is recognized by the initiation complex, which includes the
>>> separate small ribosomal subunit (40s), a special tRNA-methionine, and
>>> initiation factors (proteins) including eIF2. This leads to assembly of a
>>> complete ribosome and initiation of protein synthesis. Subsequently, in the
>>> process of elongation, AUG codons are read by a different tRNA, which is
>>> brought to the 80s ribosome bound to a protein called elongation factor 1a.
>>> This is an oversimplification, of course, but the point is that the
>>> initiation codon (=the first amino acid to be incorporated to the protein)
>>> is read by a special tRNA, hence the universal use of methionine.
>>>
>>> Opher
>>>
>>>  Yes, but why methionine? Half the time it has to be removed by
>> N-terminal peptidase to give a small first residue, or by leader sequence
>> processing. Why use a big expensive amino acid instead of choosing one of
>> the glycine codons? Is there an obvious reason, or just "it had to be
>> something, and Met happened to get selected"?
>>
>> And why sometimes alternate start codons can be used? and why doesn't
>> initiation occur also at methionines in the middle of proteins? I'm
>> guessing it has to do with 5' untranslated region and ribosome binding
>> sites. So could the start codon actually be anything you want, provided
>> there is a strong ribosome binding site there?
>>
>> Just being philosophical, and not afraid to display my ignorance,
>> eab
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *******************************************
>
> Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
>
> Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Farms Research Campus
>
> 19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
>
> email: [email protected]
>
> *******************************************
>



-- 

Bart Hazes
Associate Professor
Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology
University of Alberta

Reply via email to